Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
CBI is confirming the doubts
by VENURAJA Bowenpalle on Jun 04, 2008 10:12 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

CBI found nothing new in all this?
CBI is only confirming the earlier doubts of the TV channels and so called opinion mongers.
By all that we read and see it on TV
we can come to some conclusions:
1) The killing was NOT done by professionals.
smears of blood everywhere. There are hand prints on the wall to the staircase and on the wall above the door of the bedroom.
A professional would plan and kill only the target and NOT in an haphazard manner.

2)That there are more than one person, and they might be the age of servant Hemaraj because alchohol was taken in his room and there were three glasses.
3)They are definitely known to Hemaraj ,the servant or may be they are his close friends.

4) The crime profiler can say that the murders took place because of extreme passion gone astray. jealousy and dissappointment.
When someone is killed for exaample with 60 stab wounds , police look for the victims friends and secreat love,sex relationships.

5) The killers seem to be not only unprofessionals but also uneducated. Gruesome murders are gnerally done by an uneducated criminal rather than an educated killer.
6)There is no guarantee that killer(s) are known to the kid Arushi.But they are definitely known to Hemaraj.
7) The hand prints in blood on the staircase wall are of right hand or left hand? if it is right hand than it was a print while they were climbing up.
interrogation of Hemaraj friends hold the key.
Killers would be caught by CBI. No doubt.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:CBI is confirming the doubts
by V S on Jun 04, 2008 10:39 AM   Permalink
Why would Rajesh Talwar have whisky with his servant ? Obviously if the killers had whisky with Hemraj then it can't be Rajesh Talwar as per me.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CBI is confirming the doubts
by Vijaya Prabha on Jun 04, 2008 11:13 AM   Permalink
If killing was the motive of that killer he would have killed and gone. Why is he or they have to bother about dragging the body to the stairs, cover it up with cooler cover, lock the stair case again and go. If an outside killer enters a house he will be having the fear too, he will rush out once his work is done. He will first lock the occupants of the room first. Easy access into Arushi's room suggest, the killer was not a stranger at all. First of all teens will not keep their room open. They will latch it from inside - that is a typical teen behaviour. If it was open, she would have been drugged and was not aware of what was happening to her. Killing a person when he is awake generates a lot of struggle and the victim will try to escape by running all over. If it was an outside killer the injury will be random and not a definite pattern. If there is some truth in their jugular vein being cut, it suggests in all probability this killer is a doctor and that too a dentist. That is one vein that is very important for dentists. There are records of most brutal murders committed by highly educated people. Level of education of an individual does not suggest he is not capable of brutality. Most of the dowry related killings are committed by highly educated individuals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CBI is confirming the doubts
by VENURAJA Bowenpalle on Jun 04, 2008 12:08 PM   Permalink
The victims (both of them) throat was cut so deep that it was almost separated from the torso.
There was no indication of a puposeful intention to cut a perticular blood vein and there was no specific effort for that alone.
A butcher's knife or a Khurki used by nepalese might have been used according to the forensic experts.
It was single deep cut by heavy but sharp knife. Killers brought a knife because , a revolver for example would make a terrific noise.
A 4 inch width ,8 inch long heavy weapon was used to bang the head of the victims so much so that the skull broke and caved in .
This is generally done by the killers when the intention was to silence the victim in sleep or kill them so that victim can not shout or cry.
There was no forced entry in to the girl's room which means either it was open or she opened it to a known person(s). But the way her dead body was lying tells that she was sleeping ,which means she did not not lock the door when slept.
All this points to servants friends, and persons known to him.
Even if killers are Dr.Talwar's friends or relatives with a purpose of honour killing, they would not likely have drinks with him in a servants room.
Allowing a servant to live inside the house means he has been a very trusted servant.
Surprisingly they do not have a dog.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CBI is confirming the doubts
by Vijaya Prabha on Jun 04, 2008 03:11 PM   Permalink
Who knows whether they had drinks in a servants room? Three glasses may be placed to blame the servant. It is unusual of any teenager to be in his/her room without latching. Why was Hemaraj' body hidden? No house will be permitting partying by servants. A scene was created to blame poor Hemaraj. Which they did initially - till the body of Hemaraj was discovered. Why will an outside killer lock the terrace? Why will anyone latch the entry door instead of Dr. and Mrs. Talwar's room. According to Mrs. Talwar she opened the door to her helper in the morning on hearing door bell. The door was also latched from outside according to Mrs. Talwar which is not verified of confirmed. How will someone bolt the door from inside if it was not an insider. It is definitely an insider with the help of an outsider who has done this. No strangers will come to a defense area to murder. There are so many questions that need to be answered by family before claiming to be innocent.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:CBI is confirming the doubts
by Punyakumar on Jun 04, 2008 03:23 PM   Permalink
Frequent changing of statements and recollections will definitely lead to suspicion. When a murder had taken place in a family - that family will be searching everywhere for clues and this family not going to their terrace is a strange thing. Police have also mentioned, that they were taken to a different terrace initially. If that is true, why were they taken to a different terrace. The behaviour of this family does not fall in line with a normal grief stricken family. All the statements seems to be the handiwork of their lawyers. Talwars' are hiding something from investigations. All will be spilled out once they are subjected to Narco Analysis and Brain Mapping. In one of the interviews with a news channel Mrs.Talwar also says is that the only way to find out truth. If someone is not guilty why should they have reservation about investigations.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
2 may be involved in Noida murders: CBI