hey guys, we all heard enough of aamir khans, javed akhtar's and shabana aazmi's when there were riots in gujarat and muslims were killed.
ever heard them condemning these blasts? maybe after a few days, they will shed crocodile tears and show sympathy for victims. but are they really hurt now that hindus were killed? or are they afraid of condeming islamic terrorists? well guys, could be latter.
open up yr eyes. secularism doesnt mean pro islamic or pro catholic. hindus are the only source of developments of this country(exceptions are there is every religion, but i am talking on generalized terms) and no one should ignore interests of hindus.
one more thing.. manmohan singh ji, are u able to sleep well now? i didnt hear statement from you that u had sleepless nights because innocent hindus were killed.
RE:question to secularists
by GGG on Jul 29, 2008 12:46 AM Permalink
when state formulated a policy of secularism based on protection of right for small section on the cost of big one, then the state admn need to shed tears for big group even though the bigger groups are subject to discrimination
Don't worry all the seculars(?) are now taking a very sound and enjoyable sleep
RE:question to secularists
by Rehana on Jul 29, 2008 12:06 AM Permalink
I never heard them saying against what is happening in Kashmir. I even never heard them saying anything about the displaced Kashmiri hindus.
Are they really secular? or real human rights activists?
