"The Gujarat riots set the communal environment in India back 20 years, a strategic thinker in the Research and Analysis Wing is said to have noted."
Did he note that not doing so would have set back the Hindus by 200 years and set new standards of imptence for them?
Does he know that Hindus have been butchered all along in India by Muslim invaders,for 1000s of years, not Muslims, and because of their monumental 'chulta hai' and in-fighting attitude?
Why are there no riots after Gujarat, do you brain dead pgs even stop to think? Isn't it because the muslims, always the trouble makers, are scared they will felled like pests if they dare to start riots?
If gujarat is such a 'communal' state, why has not been there any violence against muslims after 2002? Does any 'secular' mad jackal even stop to think that? Does it not show it was only a spontaneous outburst againt the filthy, beastly, barbarous act the muslims committed in godhra?
