RE:T by Rationalist on Jul 26, 2008 09:33 PM   Permalink Yes. They should have not freed terrorist and allowed them to blast the plane killing all the passengers.    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:T by shailendra lande on Jul 26, 2008 09:35 PM   Permalink why you are talking both ways....    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:T by Rationalist on Jul 26, 2008 09:37 PM   Permalink I am talking impartially. Not taking sides.    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:T by shailendra lande on Jul 26, 2008 09:39 PM   Permalink can you tell me how many people both have killed after their release...why not the commondo operation was not done.    Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:T by shailendra lande on Jul 26, 2008 09:40 PM   Permalink don't express your views like BJP's spokeperson. Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:T by Rationalist on Jul 26, 2008 09:44 PM   Permalink You also sound like a Congress spokesperson. Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:T by Rationalist on Jul 26, 2008 09:43 PM   Permalink Think about something which is practicable.There was confirmed information that the terrorist were in possesion of all assault weapons.Before commando opertion could take place or even during the cousre they could have killed the passengers or blown the plane which is not very difficult.They were already in Taliban territory.What for do we have to catch terrorists?Not to punish them. But to protect people. If releasing terrorists is necessary for saving lives why not? Forward   |   Report abuse