RE:dalit mP?
by Srinivas r on Jul 24, 2008 04:45 PM Permalink
What is stupid in the headline ? If you feel the headline is stupid , please tell why and don't give bland statements .
RE:dalit mP?
by Bharat Prashar on Jul 24, 2008 05:14 PM Permalink
Read the article properly and you will discover that M Jagannatham has not complained not about him being discriminated against due to his Dalit origins. Rather he is quoted as saying is " .....I have been singled out and targeted because I am not a rich person. The party has not taken any action against Aadikesavulu. Is it because he is a millionaire...". So the headline did need to distinguish any discrimination then it should have been between " a not so rich MP" and "a millionaire MP". But Mohammed Siddique has somehow seen this as a case of caste discrimination and twisted the story completely to suit his own prejudices. No surprises there of course. Hope you will take this objectively.
RE:dalit mP?
by Truth Seeker on Jul 24, 2008 04:55 PM Permalink
The idiot MP voted for UPA and went and sat next to congress MPs. How stupid can he get? Anyway, he went and met Sonia and stated to be joining congress. He is just trying to invoke a Dalit issue. You should know when someone is trying to make use of some card.
RE:RE:dalit mP?
by Bharat Prashar on Jul 24, 2008 05:25 PM Permalink
If the writer had no axe to grind then perhaps the headline could have been along the lines(but not necessarily the same wording), "TDP expels one traitor MP and the fate of the other suspect still in balance". Of course the it would have been a non-story.
RE:RE:dalit mP?
by Bharat Prashar on Jul 24, 2008 05:19 PM Permalink
If the writer had no axe to grind then the headline should have been along the line (not necessarily exactly thre same wording "TDP expels one traitor MP and the fate of other suspect still uncertain". But of course in that case it would have been a non-story
