RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:46 PM Permalink
Why you could not face the truth? Why report for abuse?
The general policy of most of the rulers during the 700 years of Muslim occupation of India was to systematically replace the fabric of Hindu society and culture with a Muslim culture. They tried to destroy Indian religions, language and places of knowledge (universities e.g Nalanda were totally destroyed by Muslims). They destroyed and desecrated places of thousands of temples including Somnath, Mathura, Benaras, Ayodhaya, Kannauj, Thaneswar and in other places. There was wholesale slaughter of the monks and priests and innocent Hindus with the aim to wipe out the intellectual bedrock of the people they overran.
The Muslims could not subjugate India with ease and were never able to rule it entirely. There was a valiant and ceaseless struggle for independence by Hindus to deliver India from Muslim tyranny. The Rajputs, Jats, Marathas and Sikhs led this struggle in North India. In the South this struggle was embodied in the Vijayanagar Empire. This struggle culminated when the Marathas ended the Muslim domination of India.
RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:51 PM Permalink
Do you have any knowledge of linguistics? Hindi belongs to the family of Indo-European languages (not Indo-Arab)!
RE:RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:58 PM Permalink
Even English language now contains a lot of Hindi words. Languages develop over a period of time and adopt words from other languages also. Nothing great about that.
RE:RE:@JGN
by father on Jul 24, 2008 06:55 PM Permalink
The language developed out of the structure of the dialect called Khariboli, interspersed with the vocabulary of Persian and Arabic during the period of Mogul rule (15th-18th centuries AD).
RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:42 PM Permalink
I do not need any character certificate for the Islamic invaders. It was the ancestors of people like you who suffered at their hands. If you want to treat that an honour to your ancestors, I have no objection.
We cannot correct historic wrongs but we should be willing to accept the truth also.
RE:RE:RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:49 PM Permalink
Pl read: Calicut: The City of Truth re-visited by Prof. M.G.S. Narayanan published by University of Calicut to know about forced conversions by Tippu Sultan in Malabar and other atrocities committed by him armed-force.
RE:@JGN
by JGN on Jul 24, 2008 06:57 PM Permalink
That was not the case. Every muslim ruler knew that by alienating about 92% of the population (the muslim population at that time was about 8% only) they could not rule the country.
Aslo once having established they were only interested in massing wealth, filling up their harems with beautiful women, building monuments, etc. They neither cared for the muslims nor care for converting any one to their religion.
