There could have been some incidences of Forced Conversion at local levels. I do not dispute that. Just like Forced "Nas-Bandee" of emergency time.
Some zealous officials of Aurangzeb might have tried to build numbers...also, some armymen of Mughals might have killed many Hindus only for their faith. Such evil things unfortunately happen in this world.
But as matter of principle, you must restrict discussion to Islam, and not bring in Muslim kings.
If Forced conversion is permitted in Islam, Prophet and his immediate Followers must have done it Most, as they had reached level of supreme power and control in Arabia.
Why you fail to give examples from that part of history, if you have any.
That would be far far more convincing than actions of any criminal King for which Islam is not accountable
RE:@JGN
by Vinu Bhardwaj on Jul 24, 2008 07:46 PM Permalink
But none of 56 intolerant Islamic nations allow it. I am sure you have heard of converts getting killed, even in Turkey.
These nations have 56 US stooges sitting there with protection guarantee.
These Stooges disallow any Religious or political activity except for Prayers in Mosque
I can not carry a copy of Quran with me if I travel to Saudi....and you talk of Spreading Christianity in rule of these cr00ks ...(criminals of History, if you have read about them)
