If you are sure that it was not a temple, then why don't you allow the interested folks to explore and find the really. That does not mean demolition. By not allowing, people to visit certain sections, Govt unncecessarily created an issue. This is similar to the issue of Netaji's life. Givt did not disclose and people are still suspecting Nehru.
RE:If you are so sure
by Rasheed on Jul 24, 2008 10:21 PM Permalink
You want another Babri Masjid. But, remember Indian people suffered a lot. Still....
Anyway Advani is tired, Bal Thakkeray is old, we have to find a new champion. But, the problem is now Mayavati is in news. She can also try.Anyway let us find out more issues for communal rift
RE:If you are so sure
by Aarti on Jul 24, 2008 10:38 PM Permalink
Rasheed,
First be a sensible person and then an Indian.
When something is said look at it from both sides.
Like a typical backward Muslim don't think that people are blaming Muslims. Understand, debate and think fairly.
The Mughals had perpetrated lot of atrocity on the Hindus and people who failed to convert to Islam. Because of the foolishness of Hindus though they were majority they had to be ruled by Mughals. Read history books to find out the facts for yourself.
RE:RE:If you are so sure
by khayum pasha on Jul 24, 2008 10:40 PM Permalink
Advaniji Dont worry for your failure in recent trust vote. You were desperately searching for reasons to boycott and save your face. Get ready Now Taj Mahal is ready for your agenda. You can have a cause to mislead paople and conduct andolanas for the demolition of Taj Mahal.
RE:If you are so sure
by Tathagatha Mukherjee on Jul 24, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
I agree that Hindus are to BLAME for this corrupt rotten system...nobody is to blame but ourselves. we have a slave mentality to some masters always in history...NOW our latest master is our babu political leaders. So it is unfair to blame any other community and Hindus have to take blame.
