CHOMNATH DHAA’S OPEN GLARING AFFINITY WITH THE CONGRESS PARTY AS A SPEAKER, EVEN MADE THE LEFT PARTY TO HANG THEIR HEAD IN SHAME AND NOT BECAUSE HE DISOBEYED THE PARTY'S WHIP. SO THEY THREW DHAA.
RE:NON PARTISAN-DHAA.
by JAYARAM SHETTY on Jul 23, 2008 11:21 PM Permalink
kutty bitty, Mallus like you are famous for the buttering acts. PROVE ONE INSTANCE where Dada did wrong. First of all understand politics before commenting. Is Karat your Uncle? Hope so.
RE:NON PARTISAN-DHAA.
by hariss hariss on Jul 23, 2008 11:30 PM Permalink
"Chatterjee had voiced his displeasure over the CPI-M voting against the United Progressive Alliance alongside the Bharatiya Janata Party." why should a speaker like dada VOICE HIS DISPLEASURE OVER CPI(M) VOTING AGAINST UPA....?
RE:NON PARTISAN-DHAA.
by nishu kutty on Jul 23, 2008 11:51 PM Permalink
MR.HARISS, B'CAUSE OUR BELOVED DHAA IS A SUPER SECULARIST AND A COUSIN OF JAYARAM JETTY.
RE:NON PARTISAN-DHAA.
by nishu kutty on Jul 23, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
MR.JAYARAM, DURING 1989, THE LEFT ALONG WITH BJP COMMONLY FOUGHT FOR THE OUSTER OF CONGRESS (RAJIV GANDHI) AND EVEN FORMED A GOVERNMENT. DURING THAT TIME WAS CHOMNATH CHATERJEE SLEEPING IN HIS TOILET. (BEEDA SECULARIST). BUT NOW SUDDENLY IN 2008, HE HAS WOKEN UP AND HAS BECOME JUDO-SECULARIST?????
I AM PUTTING THE FACTS BECAUSE NOW, CHOMNATH IS BEING PROJECTED AS THE GREATEST SECULARIST. FOR A SPEAKER, SECULAR OR NON-SECULAR DOES NOT MATTER. HIS ONLY JOB IS TO CONDUCT THE HOUSE, WHETHER IT CONSISTS OF PAPPU YADHAV OR GOVINDA OR CHIDAMBARAM.
RE:NON PARTISAN-DHAA.
by nishu kutty on Jul 23, 2008 11:46 PM Permalink
MR.JAYARAM, MORE FOR YOU, LETS US NOT FORGET THAT SOMNATH CHATERJEE FOUGHT FOR SAURAV GANGULI’S INCLUSION INTO THE INDIAN TEAM AS A BENGALI ,EVEN A LALLOO PRASAD WILL NOT DO. HE ALSO GOT A SLAP FROM CHAPPEL, THE EX-INDIAN COACH, TO MATTER HIS OWN BUSINESS IN PARLIAMENT RATHER THAN INTERFERING WITH INDIAN CRICKET SELECTION POLICIES FOR WHICH “SOMNATH THE GREAT” CRIED. HE IS THE MOST PARTISAN SPEAKER TO HAVE ADORNED THE POST AND A CHEAPEST POLITICIAN. HIS INDICATION TO HIS PARTY THAT HE CANNOT BE SEEN VOTING WITH THE BJP (IMPARTIAL SPEAKER????) IS HIS REAL FACE. NO SPEAKER IN THE LAST 15-20 YEARS HAS BEHAVED AS CHEAPER AS THIS PERSON. BUT, NOW HE IS ACTING AS IF HE IS A GREAT POLITICIAN WHICH THE NEWS CHANNELS CHEAPLY POTRAY AND POOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE.
