Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
waiting to be powerful
by submitter on Jul 24, 2008 02:02 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

History of India..2500 YEARS on wikipedia..
mixtures of so many tribes coming-- going, plundering-- defeating majority living here.
Majority was always at receiving end.

Boddha (Ashoka, Harshvardhan), Jain, Greeks, Persians, Hun, Muslims, BRITISH ruling Indian cities for centuries..

Besides being opposite to many central beliefs of current day Hinduism..Islam and its followers
were most successful in the history in ruling this land.

Islamic Sultanates       1206–1596
Mughal Empire       1526–1858 (652 YEARS -at U.P./Delhi--- EXCLUDING THE Qasim (712), GHAZANI AND GHOURI INVASIONS )

I ask my Deva..my Mahadeva....FOR WHAT REASON THE DIVINE HELP IS NEVER WITH us the majority of this COUNTRY

WORSHIPERS OF YOU DEVA..WHY NOT THE HELP IS WITH..THE MAJORITY PPL OF THIS LAND... the Sanatan Dharmi.. why why why.....

WHY GANGA IS DYING SETHU IS BREAKING WHERE IS MY RAMA TO SAVE IT ALTHOUGH OUR OFFERINGS ARE THERE FOR THEM.
STILL PPL IN MY VILLAGE KEEP FAST AND GIVE YOU HONOR, WHY NOT YOU GIVE THEM THEIR HONOR BACK.
IT IS 16 yrs and RAMA your temple is waiting to be completed...come from BANVAAS build this temple this year.
YoU ARE MOST POWERFUL.. SHOW YOUR POWER NOW.. 16 yrs are long enough..WE HAVE HEARD YOUR STORIES IN RAMAYAN, YOU CAN DO ANYTHING...

History says the ppl of this land are in waiting to be powerful since thousand years how long is this wait..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:waiting to be powerful
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Jul 24, 2008 03:30 AM   Permalink

Hindus are rising. Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi movement altered course of Indian history forever.

Just watch how govt backtracks on Rama Sethu issue.

They have no balls to even touch the Sethu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Centre''s stand triggers controversy