First thing...I don't know nothing about this subject..so I am not putting any opinion about it...forgive me for my lack of knowledge, but I red in this article as ""Lord Rama destroyed the bridge and details are there in the scriptures. You cannot worship something which has been destroyed," ...My question is, is RAMSETU a place/thing of worship ( as said in above statement )or a monument of historical event?? are there instructions in scriptures to worhsip this place?? Though in both cases it is equally important and should not be destroyed.
RE:Question
by Reformer on Jul 23, 2008 11:48 PM Permalink
Besides, we are having now N-deal that will satisfy our all future power needs, so why to bother about oil coming from Gulf that is to take extra round around srilanka? we won't need this oil anymore. So let ramsetu be there.
RE:RE:Question
by rohiet on Jul 23, 2008 11:42 PM Permalink
Is the Congis believe that the bridge was destoyed by RAMA than it also mean the believe in the existence of GOD RAMA.
GOD is GREAT they are now trapped in their own words.
