RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:11 AM Permalink
When UPA won the trust vote, I was watching this channel. The excitement among the presenters was worth mentionable. If it's a channel of the slave party (in other words, loyal to some Raj family), I've got a suggestion for the 'seculars'. Change the name of the channel to something more meaningful that signifies the views of the slaves. Correct?
RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:26 AM Permalink
If CNN-IBN and CNBC are not slaves to the royal family, how can this Secular Sardesai continue with his job there? I deeply respect CNN and NBC channels for about 2 decades. In US, I am not used to seeing any political bias - the question is why it's different in India. They must take action against the presenters particularly against this Sardesai. This degrades these 2 channels. I must inform it at the HQs in Manh unless some action is taken against them.
RE:Very Secular
by Jo Ho on Jul 24, 2008 06:16 AM Permalink
UPA's distribution of money is now a open secret. Now, we the regular people are afraid if there are some beneficiaries among TV channels too. I don't know what was stopping Mr Secular Sardesai showing it on TV. We just would have enjoyed the fun for a few moments.
