Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Let us not attack Rajdeep Sardeasi below the belt
by Chetan Upadhyaya on Jul 24, 2008 08:01 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Rajdeep is a reputed journalist and we must not forget that during the last sting operation in U.P., he was asked to personally appear in the UP Assembly. He was questioned about the authencity of the tapes and many other questions. I am not his Spokesperson, but it seems that he got a strong lesson from there that it is not wise to telecast the tapes, before the CD is verified by the competent authority. So he chose to submit the CD to the Speaker. Otherwise, just like the 3 BJP members, who are going to face the constitutional wrath, Rajdeep and his Channel would have landed in trouble too, for no mistake of his.

The only thing, which is objectionable in the whole episode, is his flambuyonant & over aggressive Anchors (who should have been in Bollywood and fill the void of 'Angry Young Man' left by Amitabh Bachchan) whose only mission is to create sensation. And that is why they declared that the Tape has been handed over, which actually was submitted much later. So, the country must understand the Constitutional position & stop attacking Rajdeep Sardesai below the belt. Chetan Upadhyaya

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Let us not attack Rajdeep Sardeasi below the belt
by atul kumar on Jul 24, 2008 08:06 AM   Permalink
bloodyfool he himself barked that he is going to give tapes to speaker day beforeyesterday. he was only 10 minutes distance from parliament. it took him 24 hrs.to tavel to parliament.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Let us not attack Rajdeep Sardeasi below the belt
by pratap singh on Jul 24, 2008 08:13 AM   Permalink
atul is right...he himself said he is going (at that point in time), not the anchors.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Sardesai defends tape decision