Is Speaker was truly un-baised and did this as a speaker he should do it non partisan .. then why the reaosn that he siad did not wanted to vote with communal BJP ... is this the reson a non partisan person would give ...
If he truly belived in the deal,he should have said , that he truely belive in the deal and oppsoe the party stand ... atleast that would have showed his charater that he have to leave the company of 40 years of comrades to support the deal ... atleast many who oppose the deal(not on party lines) would have see some point in it.
He is not voting against the UPA because he did not want to vote along with communal BJP .. here no national interest .. no party with 50 years of association .... true he may belive and followed secular values what he believed and adhered to what he belived ,,,, But it cant not be said he was not partial .. he will go down as one of the speakers who was very partial and always oppose the opposition party .....followed rules when opposition members were involved , not bother when his party or congress MPs was there .. And to say he is above the party so he did not resign is just media spin with somnaths socialist friends in the media
RE:Is Speaker truly unbaised .... as he is made to belive
by Indian on Jul 24, 2008 12:36 PM Permalink
Friend, this is the news story narrated by Rajdeep....why do u put your comments here, express ur views about Rajdeep, CD & cash..anyway, nice comments
RE:Is Speaker truly unbaised .... as he is made to belive
by Hind on Jul 24, 2008 12:41 PM Permalink
rajdeep be kya karega .. he too has his political inclination , that is not wrong .... can he with stand the congress/sp goonadas on one side .. .govet machinery on other side .... no ... we know the CBI will arm twist him .... after all he to is bal bacche wala ... no point in Bad mouthing Him ... One thing now no one should allow him when acts smart .,.. as if he can do anything for journalistic values and air his know every thing attitude .... what a farce..
