Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Fact about nucleur deal
by CaptJackSparrow on Jul 22, 2008 09:38 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Nuclear deal will benefit to mostly US. Up to 2020 we will get only 15% energy of our requirement with old reactor of US.

It will benefit to only US bankrupt companies, any how US wants to destroy their old reactor but now same india will buy from them. After heavy investment you have to follow US on their every aspects.
You know US wherever they interfere that country becomes war field, Let forget about war field but after getting independence country from british this is another way to become slave of US.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by CaptJackSparrow on Jul 22, 2008 09:39 PM   Permalink
Same in india few companies are in queue like reliance, HCC, ABB and Tata. You have seen how ambani visited PM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by Sandeep on Jul 22, 2008 09:50 PM   Permalink
Also, old reactors can not be imported and will not be imported. It is not as easy to shut them off and bring them in as you seem to think.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by Sandeep on Jul 22, 2008 09:49 PM   Permalink
15% is a lot, actually it could be anywhere from 7-15%. Even if lowest power estimate was reached due to this which is 20000MW, 3 States like Karnataka can be powered without need to use any other electricity and no power cuts. This should give you an idea about the magnitude. If we hit 40000MW which some folks are now predicting, it will be enough to power 1/4th of India on current power usages.
Friend don't get confused too much in percentage terms. We are talking big numbers here.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by raheem vaheed on Jul 22, 2008 10:03 PM   Permalink
Sandeep, ever heard that " fools rush in where angels fear to tread" ? MMS was rushing in to conclude this deal, not because he was working in National Interest but because he was working to please Big Brother (Bush).

Besides, it is common knowledge that Vajpayee initiated the dialogue and almost had the same agreement before his departure in 2004, but he was not satisfied with this agreement. So he didn't operationalise it and wanted to look at it afresh after the elections. That is Statesmanship.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by Sandeep on Jul 22, 2008 10:06 PM   Permalink
You may think so but this took three long years before they could even submit the draft.
Whether it helps US, I don't care as long as it is good for India and that is what major focus should be.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Fact about nucleur deal
by CaptJackSparrow on Jul 22, 2008 09:53 PM   Permalink
Dear why we should take help of US when each and every time they have condemn our pokhran1 and 2. Think like china, if you have to become slave of gori chamdi than why unnecessary take freedom from britishers ?

We need to stand on our own in field of defence.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Congress may win battle, but lose war