Guys do u know US today only produces 20% of electricity from Uranium, It cost it 2cent/KWH, Now it has stopped further resrerch in Uranuim & shifted to Hydrogen & also it passed a budget of 2b$ for reasech on Hydrogen which it thinks it will cost them only 1.5cent/KWH. Also it will generate Hydrogen in abundent quantity which it want to sell in the market to run the vehicles. Do by Nuclear Deal we will get this technolgy also, or we get only the obsloute uranium technoly.
RE:Nuclear Energy
by funny on Jul 22, 2008 11:23 PM Permalink
Dear Guest,
You are so true. I am a HVAC Engineer too. I am also living in US. Not to make a big fool out of you, the statements you made above is true 8 years ago. US is not pursuing seriously about Hydrozen as the transportation and hazards involved with this technology. Sad part you you is US is still banking on Uranium and THE FUTURE IS STILL THERE FOR URANIUM.
Just want to ask you a straight forward question: How much did Advani pay you for publicizing wrong info? lol.
RE:RE:Nuclear Energy
by vinay goel on Jul 23, 2008 11:12 PM Permalink
Dear funny, I am not against the nuclear deal, nuclear deal should be done, just i was high lighting the HYDROGEN nuclear energy which US is now working on its new geneartion nuclear plant. SOURCE of information world-nuclear.org/info/inf41.html.
RE:Nuclear Energy
by Bala Ganapathy on Jul 22, 2008 11:19 PM Permalink
Dear Friend ... its good to have statistics ... but who created it or who gave this info ..
