RE:India should sign nuclear deal.
by kancj on Jul 23, 2008 12:33 AM Permalink
I was with nuclear establishment for some time and can tell u this much... there is nothing to hide in nuclear power plants which just uses uranium fuel and generates power....and there is no need to test any more unless there new nuclear weapon designs .....and if so break the deal
RE:India should sign nuclear deal.
by Mongesh Madhavan on Jul 23, 2008 12:36 AM Permalink
so then why do US nuclear reactors are not shown on google earth. or why donot they publicly expose how much energy they are producing.
India is developing nation and if we stop research and development now. then we would become a story of past.
RE:India should sign nuclear deal.
by sanjay on Jul 23, 2008 12:40 AM Permalink
American civil nuclear reactors are under IAEA monitor. Trust me that more important that being seen on google earth
RE:India should sign nuclear deal.
by Mongesh Madhavan on Jul 23, 2008 12:44 AM Permalink
but sanjay it also says that we should stop nuclear test and why should we i think india needs to develop more nuclear weapons
RE:India should sign nuclear deal.
by sanjay on Jul 23, 2008 12:50 AM Permalink
No, there is a clear distinction between civilian and military nuclear reactors in the deal. India currently has around 100-120 nuclear war heads (conservative estimates). What we need is better delivery mechanism to deliver those nuclear weapons than more war heads itself. Anyways if we feel we need to test again we can do that. Its just that the deal will be off
