I FULLY AGREE WITH THIS EXPERT OPINION OF THIS EXPERT.INDIA SHOULD NOT DEPEND ON THIS UNRELIABLE AMERICANS IT IS FOOLISH TO GO FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY. IT IS HAZARDOUS AND UNSAFE AND VERY COSTLY IN LONG RUN INDIA IS IN A TROPICAL AREA AND PLENTY OF SOLAR ENERGY AVAILABLE AND ALSO WIND ENERGY WE ARE NOT EXPERT IN NUCLEAR SAFTY. EVEN THE ADVACED COUNTRY LIKE USA AND RUSSIA COULD NOT AVOID THE CASES LIKE THREE MILE ISLLAD AND CHERNOBYIL. WE SHOULD TRAP GEOTHERMAL ENERGY WHICH IS CHEAP ALSO WE SHOULD DO RESEARCH FOR USING THE POTENTIAL ENERGY OF SEA WATER DEPTH . UTILIZING THE SEA WATER HYDRO PRESSURE DEPTH AMERICAN BUSINESS MEN WILL GIVE ONLY SUBSTANDARD MATERIAL. IN ALL SENSE NUCLEAR ENERGY IS HIGHLY UNSAFE AND COSTLY IN LONG RUN AS WE HAVE TO DEPEND ON IMPORTED URANIUM
RE:NUCLEAR POWER IN INDIA
by Sandeep on Jul 16, 2008 02:34 PM Permalink
This article is based on hypothesis and so are your ideas which are unproven for any large scale energy production. Japan produces 40% and France ~70% of their enrgy from Nuclear. India has to get on bandwagon and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
