AS PER THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY, IT IS APPARENT FROM THE NUCLEAR DEAL DRAFT AGREMENT THAT,
1. IAEA , USA WILL TRACK EACH AND EVERY OUNCE OF THE THE NUCLEAR MATERIAL SHIPPED TO INDIA AND WILL GAIN ACCESS TO ALL IMPORTANT INDIAN MILITARY AND NON MILITARY RESTRICTED NUCLEAR SITES, IN PEACE TIME AND IN WAR TIME, AT INDIA'S COST - ATLEAST US $ 1.2 MILLION PER YEAR PER PLANT. INDIA WILL HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO STOP THEM AT ANY POINT OF TIME, IN THE FUTURE.
2. AS MANY AS 14 EXISTING NUCLEAR ESTABLISHMENTS OF INDIA WILL BE OPEN TO CHECKS AND CONTROLS BY IAEA , USA ... TILL NOW IAEA HAS RIGHT TO CHECK ONLY 5 OTHER NUCLEAR PLANTS IN THE WORLD, IN ALL COUNTRIES PUT TOGEHER, OUT OF 400 ODD PLANTS PRESENTLY RUNNING ALL OVER THE WORLD.
3. THE DEAL IS AMBIGUOUS AND NOT CLEAR. USA CAN STATE ANY REASON OR EXCUSE FOR NON COMPLIANCE AND UNDERMINE INDIA , SEGREAGATE INDIA FROM THE WORLD COMMUNITY, IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS ON INDIA OR ANY OTHER PUNISHMENT (OR MAY EVEN ATTACK, WHO KNOWS).
3. INDIA WILL BE TREATED AT PAR WITH ALL THE NON NUCLEAR STATES OF THE WORLD, AS A NON NUCLEAR STATE. AS THE NON NUCLEAR POLICY AS PER THEIR FORM POLICY NO 66 OF 1954 HAS BEEN SIGNED BY INDIA. ( LATER ON PAKISTAN MAY ACQUIRE NUCLEAR STATUS BECOME A NUCLEAR POWER, LEAVING INDIA A NON NUCLEAR STATE). THIS DEAL SHALL MAKE INDIA A NON NUCLEAR STATE.
4. IT DOES NOT PROMISE ANY FISSIONABLE MATERIAL TO INIDA. NOTHING ABOUT GIVING NUCLEAR MATERIAL TO INDIA
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by Guest on Jul 13, 2008 09:10 AM Permalink
3. THE DEAL IS AMBIGUOUS AND NOT CLEAR. USA CAN STATE ANY REASON OR EXCUSE FOR NON COMPLIANCE AND UNDERMINE INDIA , SEGREAGATE INDIA FROM THE WORLD COMMUNITY, IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS ON INDIA OR ANY OTHER PUNISHMENT (OR MAY EVEN ATTACK, WHO KNOWS).
Such clear, rational thought, logically arrived at with no recourse to paranoia whatsoever. And done with such finesse; the full caps was such a nice touch, makes the entire rant so readable.
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by nutan dil on Jul 12, 2008 10:22 PM Permalink
HAS BEEN CONFIRMED IN THE DRAFT AGREEMENT, ONLY EXCEPT THE WORDS "SUPPLY OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL" SEEM TO BE HURRIEDLY ADDED IN THE HEADING.
5. HOWEVER, EVEN IF THEY START SUPPLYING FISSIONABLE MATERIAL TO INDIA, INDIA WILL BE DEPENDENT ON THEM FOR NUCLEAR POWER AND THEY CAN DISRUPT POWER IN INDIA AT ANY TIME. BLACK OUT INDIA AT ANY TIME BY STOPPING THE SUPPLY TO INDIA, AS PER THEIR INTERNAL ACTS. BUT INDIA WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BACK OUT FROM THE AGREEMENT WITH IAEA, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, ONCE SIGNED.
6. IT IS AN ONE SIDED AGREEMENT. INDIA CANNOT WITHDRAW FROM THIS IRREVOCABLE AGREEMENT AT ANY TIME IN THE FUTURE, EVEN IF USA STOPS SUPPLYING EVEN A GRAM OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL TO INDIA. INDIA CAN NEVER SHUT ITS DOORS TO IAEA AND USA INSPECTORS ONCE THE AGREEMENT IS SIGNED AND INDIA WILL ALWAYS HAVE TO GIVE ACCESS TO THE FOREIGN INSPECTORS TO SECRET MILITARY NUCLEAR ESTABLISHMENTS OF INDIA (AS PER IAEA DRAFT AGREEMENT), EVEN IF USA , WEST STOPS SUPPLYING EVEN A GRAM OF NECLEAR MATERIAL. INDIA WILL HAVE NO RIGHT TO GO BACK AND SAFEGUARD ITS NUCLEAR ESTABLISHMENTS.
7. INDIA CANNOT STORE EVEN ONE OUNCE OF MATERIAL WITH ITSELF WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION (EXCEPT I KG OF PLUTONIUM, WHICH IS ESTIMATED TO BE ABUNDANT IN INDIA). 8. ANY TIME PAKISTAN WANTS INFOMRATION ABOUT INDIAN NUCLEAR DETAILS, IT CAN TURN TO ITS ALY USA, OR BRIBE IAEA OFFICIALS/ INSPECTORS AND GET THE REQUIRED NUCLEAR DETAILS REGARDING INDIA.
RE:RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by nutan dil on Jul 12, 2008 10:24 PM Permalink
THE TV MEDIA IS SO BUSY ABOUT TELECASTING THE BAIL OF DR TALWAR, FATHER OF BABY ARUSHI SINCE THE LAST TWO DAYS, THAT THEY FORGOT, OR HAD NO TIME ,TO GIVE /DISCUSS THE DETAILS REGARDING THE VITAL SELL OUT OF THE NATION IN THE NAME OF NUCLEAR DEAL. HOWEVER SOME NEWSPAPERS HAVE DONE THEIR JOB BY GIVING DETAILS OF THE NUCLEAR AGREEMENT DRAFT.
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by Sanjay on Jul 12, 2008 10:33 PM Permalink
I happy to read your views, also thy includd non-nuclear materials in this agreement, whih hav to b returned.
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by AK on Jul 12, 2008 10:45 PM Permalink
Material balance has to be conducted and remains returned. Should not be a concern.
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by All Right on Jul 12, 2008 10:26 PM Permalink
Omar Abdullah, who was Minister of External Affairs during NDA in tonight's Big Fight confirmed that the NDA was negotiating a similar deal. He also confirmed what they got in the deal was substantially less than what the UPA got. Most importantly, he confirmed that the NDA was prepared to sign such a deal which is distinctly worse
RE:RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by somnath bhattacharya on Jul 12, 2008 11:04 PM Permalink
Mr right, you are absolutely right about Omar Abdullah with knowing fact that he has gone with UPA on this deal like Mulayam. So he will say what congress will ask him to say. Mr. Mulayam has been convinced by Mr Kalam bt what about the other Nuclear scientist who have some reservation. Those scientist including Mr Iynger are also having some knowldege about neuclear science. No goverment official are dare to say the constraints of this deal. everybody is looking about its prospects.This deal has both the faces, so lets discuss its pros n cons
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by AK on Jul 12, 2008 10:37 PM Permalink
Times of India and Economic Times are known BJP supporters whereas Hindustan Times is a Congress supporter. So do not go by the newspapers. Read the agreements and decide for yourself.
RE:THE TIMES OF INDIA AND ECONOMIC TIMES OF 11 JULY,
by Real Karnataka on Jul 12, 2008 10:52 PM Permalink
Shame to Miss Mamata Bannerjee..When I was in my early days in my childhood,I use to heard as her opinios "congress is B team of CPM"...Now all Bengal can see ,who is B team of CPM ...BJP and Mamata's Trinamool is B team of CPM
