....... the nuke deal would have been long signed because there would have been no hyde act to begin with. the reason fo rhte hyde act is late rep. lantos's deep suspicion of the anti-hindu gandhi party cozying up to iran.
RE:if the bjp was ruling party today......
by All Right on Jul 13, 2008 10:05 AM Permalink
Yes you right Pradip. Omar Adbullah Minister of State of External Affairs of the then NDA government went to record in Big Fight, NDTV exactly what you said.
1. The NDA Govt was negotiating a similar treaty 2. The terms of which were perceptibly worse 3. Though the terms were perceptibly worse, the NDA was prepared to sign.
Further Talbot, US Ambassador at the time of the NDA tenure, in a book revealed, the NDA government had secret negotiations with the US to sign NPT, CTBT, viz. internationally agreeing to permanently give up our rights to test a nuclear bomb.
If Talbot's book is not believe, then the official recordings of Vajpayee (1999) and Jaswant Singh (2000) speeches to the Gen Assembly of the UN, where they promised that India uni-laterally and permanently gave up its right to test.
So who is anti-Hindu, anti-India? Who is opposing an agreement that is termed anti-Muslim and appeasing Mullahs. You might be a knickerwallah, but the record of BJP speals for itself
RE:if the bjp was ruling party today......
by All Right on Jul 13, 2008 03:30 PM Permalink
Hello MY CLONE:
You seem to have misunderstood the 123 treaty as your effing 123 points above.
You no doubt will believe not only Talbot, but effing Osama Bin Laden if he provides some sound bytes against NDA.. :-) I for one, am yet to meet a salesman who'd point out that the last customer had actually kicked his wares, and that's the reason he wants you to buy... perhaps your locality contains such idiots.... coz your locality may be that types, since YOU are there.. :-)
