We shoiild object basically heading of the article itself. Is our pm is mearly sikh or he is first citizen of india. was he selected as pm beceause of his sikh identity or his contribution on making india open for global economy, or close to ganghi family or loyal to them. Whatever will be the reason for pm's selection, but it is not on certianly on his cast or releigion. It is redicuous to say that he is sikh therefore he should discuss sikh representing committee. Is our PM representing on behalf of entire nation or merely his community. I feel we should stop thinking on cast and relegionwise politics otherwise on day like ussr disintrigration of nation is not too far.Secondly can govt open any confodential reports or documents to any other third party who has nothing to do in politics.SAD may be a religius institute, but cannot interfere in govt functiones, and more importantly cannot demand anything from pm just beceause he is sikh.Tommorow any muslim will ask such thing from Mr. kalam just beceause he is mumsil. Now we should think above the cast/ relegion line.
RE:is PM is only sikh?
by sachin ahuja on Jul 13, 2008 01:03 PM Permalink
It's simple man SAD ?uks... case should be registered against people like Simarnjit Singh Mann, leader of MNS (I forgot the name also) , Shiv Sena , Thakrey family, Narendra Modi anyone who gives hatered speech... all should be put behind Bars.... they are also criminals just like Dawood...
