See ARTICLE 103 of safeguards agreement. Even for minor non-compliance from part of India, IAEA can report to Security Council to take military action against India. Article 103 given below.
"103. If the Board determines in accordance with Article XII.C of the Statute of the Agency that there has been any non-compliance by India with this Agreement, the Board shall call upon India to remedy such non-compliance forthwith, and shall make such reports as it deems appropriate. In the event of failure by India to take full remedial action within a reasonable time, the Board may take any other measures provided for in Article XII.C of the Statute."
“To make such reports as it deems fit” - is the UN language for saying "report for military action to security council".
This article 103 must be corrected to the effect that in case of non-compliance, IAEA can decide to stop or reduce further supply of nuclear material for a definite or indefinite term and the decision to be reviewed annually by IAEA.
Why? We know last year IAEA nearly recommended military action against Iran, It is a political body and if in future Indo US relation becomes bad, US can do this kind of things.
Saddam was once best friend of US (like India now) and finally US captured Saddam and was hanged “Live Telecast”. So relations can go sour anytime and we must be careful.
INDIA please change article 103 to avoid risking Security Council decison for military action against India.
RE:Agreement not safe
by Joy Abraham on Jul 11, 2008 11:52 PM Permalink
If you have a point or arguement, display whatever supporting material is needed and make your argument. Dont expect others to supply you with reference material.
RE:RE:Agreement not safe
by Goutam Sen on Jul 12, 2008 03:22 PM Permalink
Abe salle, KAlam jab bola tha, tab usko sab rule pata nahi tha, Ab jake puch--how about the article 103.. Salle andhe.. Kuch to rule pad.then comment kar...
RE:Agreement not safe
by Joy Abraham on Jul 11, 2008 11:47 PM Permalink
Do you mean everyone else in this country except one Kalam should close their mouth? Is Kalam the dictator of India?
RE:Agreement not safe
by Goutam Sen on Jul 12, 2008 03:20 PM Permalink
Abe salle, KAlam jab bola tha, tab usko sab rule pata nahi tha, Ab jake puch--how about the article 103.. Salle andhe.. Kuch to rule pad.then comment kar...
RE:Agreement not safe
by AK on Jul 12, 2008 12:02 AM Permalink
You can not equate India with Iran & Iraq. India is a responsible democratic nuclear power. Both Iraq & Iran are extremist muslim states without nuclear weapons.
RE:Agreement not safe
by Hate Who divides on Jul 12, 2008 12:09 AM Permalink
thats why we are always losing land to neighbour in war ................... you want to make Responsible or Coward ............its always due to ill politics of congress we lost land ............then also you want we support to congreess .........they even want to release afzal guru ............we are not mentally retardedlike to support this minority and incompetent congress
RE:Agreement not safe
by Ha ha hi hi on Jul 11, 2008 11:50 PM Permalink
WE r not Iran!!! we r India.. we can maul USA if need arises.. but N-Deal is must to sustain Power Crisis or be ready to face Blackout
RE:RE:Agreement not safe
by Joy Abraham on Jul 11, 2008 11:54 PM Permalink
How can you maul USA? India has no power even to scratch the surface of USA. Go for treaties with equals, you can do something if they misbehave. USA defines the law , so you will be helpless if you have a difference of opinion with USA anytime in future.
RE:RE:Agreement not safe
by Goutam Sen on Jul 12, 2008 03:25 PM Permalink
Abe Ha ha hi hi, Tere bap ne koi naam nahi diya tha kya. Salle tu to asli pakis.. Hiding your name..
