HEY LOT ...PUT ..NERHU KHAN DYNASTY ....IN A GOOGLE SEARCH....YOU WILL BE SHOCKED....WHAT FOOLS WE HAVE BEEN ALL THIS TIME ..MADE TO BELEIVE THAT NERHU WAS A KASHMIRI PANDIT.......
RE:tiger200002
by Ezhil Maran on Jul 11, 2008 10:45 PM Permalink
Nehru may not be as tall a leader as he was portrayed by the Left leaning historians and Press, but he was a leader. His many miscalculations and misadventures are being felt even today. But,let us not go overboard in our criticism of him.
RE:tiger200002
by JGN on Jul 11, 2008 10:49 PM Permalink
We are talking with the benefit of hind-sight. The historical events are to be judged from the correct perspective. Nehru was a true secularist and there is no doubt about that.
Our Country would be poorer if we follow narrow religious agenda (majority variety as well as minority variety). I would not feel complete without my muslim and christian friends.
RE:tiger200002
by JGN on Jul 11, 2008 11:00 PM Permalink
Which country are you talking about? India is a secular democratic country where equality before law is guaranteed by the Constitution.
Has any one stopped you from getting educated or persuing your profession? At the same time, do not try to inflame passions in the name of religion.
RE:tiger200002
by Ezhil Maran on Jul 11, 2008 11:10 PM Permalink
JGN, please say whether you support religion based reservation? In what way are Muslims and Christians considered "backward" to deserve special concession? There are many Hindu communities which are worse off than the Muslims and Christians. Yet they don't get any concessions which the minorities get by virtue of their religion. Is it fair? Shouldn't economic or social backwardness be the real criterion for special support? How are the Muslims worse off socially, compared to others? How do you justify fee waiver for all Muslim students which is not there for others even if they are poor? Is it fair to consider development of districts only by virtue of minority population? Is that a criteria for backwardness?
I have many Muslim and Christian friends, and I have never let that be a factor in our friendship. But when I see political parties competing with each other to give special concessions to someone just because he or she is a Muslim or a Christian irrespective of their economic status, it pains me. Don't the poor of the majority community deserve no support?
RE:tiger200002
by JGN on Jul 11, 2008 11:13 PM Permalink
I am against all sorts of segretation of people in the name of caste, creed, colour, religion, region, etc. Reservation, if at all required, should be based on economic creteria. I do not beleive in the dogmas of any religion. Beleive in the principles of neo-humanism.
RE:tiger200002
by Ezhil Maran on Jul 11, 2008 10:55 PM Permalink
True, religion should exist only behind closed doors of our houses and not on the streets. But the Government goes out of the way to create religious a divide, in the name of secularism.
RE:tiger200002
by kitttigadu on Jul 12, 2008 08:54 AM Permalink
Ahmed Patel is probably some kind of personal valet - Patel fetch water, Patel press my legs, or Patel make some tea, or Patel water the plants, or Patel make my bed, or Patel take Rahul Gandhi to the bathroom.
RE:tiger200002
by JGN on Jul 11, 2008 10:37 PM Permalink
These all are rubbish. Though I also do not support Congress party nor have very high regards for Pandit Nehru, we should not denegrate a tall leader like him.
RE:tiger200002
by TIGER MAN on Jul 11, 2008 10:43 PM Permalink
NERU DID NOTHING FOR INDIA...REALLY SPEAKING SARDAR PATEL SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE 1st PRIME MINISTEr OF INDIA....>>>ANYWAY INDIA LOST A LARE PORTION TO CHINA IN NERUS TIME EVEN IF HE WAS WARNED MANY TIMES.. WHEN PAKISTAN SEEZED THE WHOLE OF KASHMIR...SARDAR PATEL..HOME MINISTER...ORDERED INDIAN TROOPS TO CROSS PAKISTAN AND GRAB BACK THE WHOLE OF KASHMIR...WHEN INDIAN TROOPS HAD REGAINED HALF OF KASHMIR...NERU BEHIND PATELS BACK...CALLED IN THE UN ON THE SO CALLED L.O.C....PATEL SOON RESIGNED AFTER THAT BETRAIAL...
