Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Why we need costly Energy
by rajeev kulshrestha on Jul 10, 2008 09:36 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

After signing deal It will take ten year to operationalised
Upto 2020 we are not been able to produce ten thousand Megawatt from
Nuclear Energy
Today we are generating only 2600 megawatt It needs Huge investment (1.5 lackh crore)
and advance Technology, Scientist will needed to run this plants ,
High And Tight Sequirity arangements needed for This Save from prolifiration etc.

Cost of nuclear Energy is 10 Rs Per m unit

Tamil Nadu is Producing 5000 megawatt From Wind Energy till this year
Maharastra is Producing 1200 megawatt From Wind Energy
One Wind tower can give you 620 kwh to 2 megawatt of power
Pune Based Company Suzlon(our Indian company) is producing Upto 1 megawatt wind Turbine
It can be deployed near seashore where Plenty of Wind is available
free of Cost

Some Western Country deployed it in side the Sea also...(Hundred meter inside the sea)
It is ten times Cheaper than nuclear Technology and with Less investment (compare to Nuclear)
It will give lakhs of employement to Rural Semi skilled youth of coastal India
We Have Thousands Kms of Sea shore


Today China is Behind From Tamil Nadu in Wind Energy
Suzlone alone got more than thousands crore of contracts from China
China is Heavily investing in it .In ten years they are going to generate one Lackh Megawatt From This Wind Energy.. then
We(Whole Indaia) would Be Behind From them.

Now a Days The H2 fuel car is coming in the markets
so why not we would invest in h2 fuel reactor
so

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:RE:Why we need costly Energy
by arun kumar on Jul 10, 2008 09:50 AM   Permalink
GOOD

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why we need costly Energy
by All Right on Jul 10, 2008 10:07 AM   Permalink
You commies and knickerwallah till yesterday had been crying aloud from your roof-tops, the deal is dead, the deal is dead!

All you must be looking rather foolish hearing the midnight news shock that MMS circulated the draft agreement with IAEA and by end of this month, the IAEA agreement signed. By mid-August,
NSG will give their waiver so that the US Congress can pass the deal by September end, failing which November.

So now that the deal cannot be stopped, the next lie -deal cannot be operationalized before 10 years.

As soon as we get the NSG waiver, I am sure many countries will come to our doorsteps to supply uranium - a step that can immediately boost the capacity utilization of the 14 civilian nuclear plants we put under the deal. They are operating at below 50% capacity. So by year end we should see capacity utilization rise at least 10-20%.

It is rather puerile logic to suggest that we should forgo any thrust on nuclear power to pursue expansion of capacity on other energy options like wind energy. All these options are strategically being pursued by India simultaneously to reduce dependence on fossil fuel and gas.

The N-deal is not designed within a short term tunnel but a more broader long term vision. It does not envision India being nuclear importers but also lays the foundation for India to be a major global player in the nuclear market. It is possibly 10 years from now, the US will be buying our fast reactors and dependent on our thorium supply!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Why we need costly Energy
by SI on Jul 10, 2008 09:53 AM   Permalink
Does the deal prevent us from making wind towers?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
G-8 to support N-deal; PM returns