Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
21st is not earliest
by Dharmesh Patel on Jul 11, 2008 02:09 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Sardarji, isnt 21st is far ahead? according to dicsnry, in time context earliest is like in few hrs or today, tomorrow or atleast day after tomorrow.
Could you please prepond it to friday 11th July 2008? OR please spare word "earliest"?


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:21st is not earliest
by TIGER MAN on Jul 11, 2008 02:14 AM   Permalink
WHEN BJP LOST BY 1 VOTE IN 1998 THEY WENT TO VOTE IN ONLY 3 DAYS...BYT BJP DIDNT COMPLAIN OR HORSETRADE WHEN THEY LOST....BUT CONGRESS IS VERY GREEDY AND WORRIED ..AND AS THINGS ARE GOING ..THEY ARE HEADING TOWARDS DEFEAT...SO GREEDY CONGRESS HAS BEEN GIVEN MORE TIME SO THAT THEY CAN TRY TO HORSE TRADE..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:21st is not earliest
by Dharmesh Patel on Jul 11, 2008 02:43 AM   Permalink
I havnt seen any country in the world whos leaders and presidents dance on bartenders tune.
What pity...
The fact is people needs to be wake up and throw them out of the politics arena itself so our next generation be safe from such useless politicians

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Will seek trust vote at the earliest: PM