Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Pranab Mukherjee Told Lies to the Parliament
by Indian Indian on Jul 08, 2008 07:07 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Pranav Mukherjee told the Indian Parliament that Hyde act doesn't apply on India. While US media squarly accused the Indian Foreign minister for telling lies to it's parliament. Hyde Act does apply to India, and this is thing they are hiding from nation. Everything is going in the right direction for the congress as per plan. The govt. will fall soon. The deal will not be signed(Sardaar has no Intention to get it signed). The media blitz and all the hue and cry over the Nuke deal was to put cover over the 4 year of dark ages of this govt. This govt. was a total failure and every MP was worried how are we going to go back to over voters in 2009. The deal is a face saver for this non-performing govt. It will fall soon, but as most of the people on this forum thinks 1000s of Indian voters will think 'Sardaar sacrificed his govt.' and he will also join Maino Antonia as a great Martyr...



    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Pranab Mukherjee Told Lies to the Parliament
by All Right on Jul 08, 2008 07:12 PM   Permalink
Both Pranab Murkherjee and the US are telling the truth

Knickerwallahs point out that 1-2-3 Agreement is over-ridden by the Hyde Act. For one thing, an international treaty over-rides national laws. Even for argument sake the reverse holds true, what does the 1-2-3 Agreement say:

Article 2, Para 1 of the 123 agreement text released on August 3, 2007 clearly states:

"The Parties shall cooperate in the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Each Party shall implement this Agreement "in accordance with its respective applicable treaties, national laws," regulations, and license requirements concerning the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes."

So there is no mention of Hyde Act specifically. Only indirectly through "national laws". But this mention of "national laws" is mutual. This means if Hyde Act is a domestic law of the US, we can have a law exactly reverse of the Hyde Act. In a dispute, we are bound by our national laws while the US is to theirs creating a gridlock.

So the argument of Hyde Act is only a bogey used by commies and Knickerwallahs to confuse the public



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
''Full text of IAEA pact can''t be shared''