Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
@ Muhammad Yusuf
by JGN on Jul 07, 2008 05:52 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

India is occupying Kashmir (muslim nation)............when was Kashmir a Muslim nation? Kashmir was ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh at the time of independence.

India has the second largest muslim population in the world - first being Indonesia. Why do you want only a small piece of land exclusively for muslims when your religion talks about "universal brotherhood"??

Would you like the rest of India declared as a "hindu nationa" and pack all the muslims to Pak and Bengladesh, specially created for the Muslims who felt that they cannot co-exist with the other citizens of our Country?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Yaqoot Mir on Jul 07, 2008 06:11 PM   Permalink
YOur Logic wreaks of IGNORANCE JGN:

1. Kashmir became a problem because the partition formula SAID MULSIM MAJORITY AREAS FOR MUSLIMS where is the demand for autonomy an illegitimate demand? Maharaja Ranjit singhs control of Kashmir became MOOT with partition he and India and Pak had to follow RULES OF PARTITION there after my freind.

2. India having the second largest Muslim population is irrelevant to this argument? whats your point. In fact if it does them may be That population needs a seperate country too?

3. Yes please declare India a HINDU state infact that will suit us, because based on that pretext you moron, Muslims whereever they are in MAJORITY will declare a Muslim State, how does that help

Last btu not least: NEHRU was the foremost proponent of division NOT our leaders reason is simple:

Even after partition there are more than 480 million Muslims in INDIA, combined with 160 million in Pakistan and 175 million in Bangla land...that 800 Million Muslims in so called HINDU India? out of a population of 1 Billion 80% are Muslim where is this Hindu state you talk about Nehru new this a United India would have been MUSLIM my freind not a hindu dream state you talk about thank your lucky starts or you would be under Muslim rule JUST LIKE THE GOOD OLD TIMES.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Vivek Harry on Jul 07, 2008 06:18 PM   Permalink
faux paus, what do you mean our leaders, that means your heart is still Pakistani

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by JGN on Jul 07, 2008 06:23 PM   Permalink
Pl read some more history. Have you heard of the Lucknow pact of 1916? That was the origin of two nation theory. Leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, etc were not even active in Politics at that time.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>would be under Muslim rule JUST LIKE THE GOOD OLD TIMES. ...............that is another foolish belief. India was never under muslim totally. The Islamic invaders ruled only some part of our Country.

You need to read some more history than the skewed logic of Dr. Zakir Naik.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Mohammed Zameer on Jul 07, 2008 06:44 PM   Permalink
Mr. JGN

Mughals has ruled india for 700 years and hindu rajas obeying the law created by muslims rulers.. Taj Mahal, Kutub Minar, Lal Killa.. jahangir musuem has made by mughals.. where we are earning crores of rupees from tourist..

What hindu rajas has done only created kandhar (cave) nothing else give me one example of ur hindu rajas has created from were our govt. can earned? English ruler created the most necessary communication Trains and dont forget Horah Bridge..

India is wealthest country in the time of mughals where there is no inflations and poor people.. n we should admit that British ruler has taken most of the wealths from India where mughal has not even taken single penny from India..

So now tell me good times is now or at that time..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by JGN on Jul 07, 2008 06:53 PM   Permalink
Yes, Mr. Mohammed Zameer, there was no place called Indian sub-continent before the arrival of Islamic invaders and European colonizers!!!!!!!!! Are you happy now? Why you people have no proud in our ancesteral culutre? The Indian sub-continent had a civilized life when most of the other continents were still in the stone-age. The period of Chandragupta Maurya, 900 years before even Muhammed was born, is know as the "Golden Period" of Indian history. Have you heard of the Universities at Nalanda and Taxshila?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Ashesh Gupta on Jul 07, 2008 07:17 PM   Permalink
We all seem to belong to "educated" background and also would be living our lives in "Secured" environments. Even then, we all end up taking our discussion to a skewed reality; and a state where it becomes argumentative (and nothing else).
Imagine the situation with the war-ravaged areas. How can we expect people living under such conditions to be able to think with sanity?
It may sound bookish, but the solution to ALL humans' problems is to realise that " Irrespective of religion, Right or Wrong can always only be identified....you just need to keep the past away, and think of the future!"

Lets all try to build a future for humans!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by santosh satpathy on Jul 07, 2008 07:07 PM   Permalink
".. Taj Mahal, Kutub Minar, Lal Killa.. jahangir musuem has made by mughals"

hello idiot,u must know that Mughals built these things with wealth of this country,as they didnt bring anything with them fron theit country of roigin.Infact they rode only donkeys in their country of origin.

And another fact that India makes most of its turist money from Rajastan,Goa,Kerala places one hardly finds any muslim influence.

Ur knowledge only shows the perils of a madrasa education.Its ppl like u r curse on this country who forcefully converted to islam & now still licking up to Arab masters.What an irony???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Sharp on Jul 07, 2008 06:34 PM   Permalink
Improve your Arithmetic before you argue.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Muhammad Yusuf
by Shailendra Sharma on Jul 07, 2008 06:02 PM   Permalink
First Ruler was King Lalitaditya...

The name Kashmir was after Kashyap Maharishi.

All Hindus were reduce to minority and then to Zero in 1992 by Islamic Terrorism....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Kabul: 7 killed in blast near embassy