Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Jammu REJECTED autonomy.... TWICE!!!!
by Jaishal on Aug 12, 2008 12:54 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

TWICE Jammu was offered autonomy from Kashmir, and TWICE the Hindu nationalist parties REJECTED the offer. The first offer was made in the 50's by Sheikh Abdullah, and the next in 1996 by Farooq Abdullah. Those parties REJECTED autonomy, now they complain that Jammu doesn't get a fair voice in government? Kashmir is more populous than Jammu, thats why Kashmir's voice is louder. It's called democracy, and yet the BJP and its allies now are acting like saviours when they rejected political arrangements that would have helped Jammu.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Jammu REJECTED autonomy.... TWICE!!!!
by vijay dhar on Aug 13, 2008 12:32 PM   Permalink
Sheer nonsense and nothing else.
Go thru the history it was BJp which opposed dual prime ministership and dual constitution when Sheikh Abdullah was at the helm of affairs after partition and Shyama prasad Mukerjee laid down his life in the Jail of Srinagar for only that
It was right on the part of BJP not to accept the offer from untrustwothy duo of father and his son
I think that clears your views for all the times to come

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Jammu REJECTED autonomy.... TWICE!!!!
by Shyam on Aug 14, 2008 11:12 AM   Permalink
That means nothing but making a easier way for the Porkistan to take over the entire Kashmir from us leaving the Jammu part. We should rather attack and occupy the POK immediately.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Jammu REJECTED autonomy.... TWICE!!!!
by mohmed khan on Aug 25, 2008 01:21 PM   Permalink
You people think that might is right.You can off course silent the voices by showering bullets and killing innocents....but how long....you couldn,t silence it from 1988 and after 20 years they r singing the same sone.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
''We have to address the Kashmir dispute''