Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Blind support
by Dinesh on Jul 06, 2008 10:42 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Mine is blind support to BJP, because they are the party who is not appeasing the minorities at the cost of majority. Where as Congress is appeasing the minority at the cost of majority. As far as developmental works are considered probably all are same. The most noble PM(MMS) and President(A.Kalam) could not do anything, then who can develop.



    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
  RE:Blind support
by Basheer on Jul 06, 2008 10:44 PM   Permalink
If BJP's ideological strength itself is anti-minoritism and derived hatred, how they can appease minorities?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Blind support
by Dualist on Jul 06, 2008 10:48 PM   Permalink
And the minorities are anti-national and anti-hindu. SO whats wrong in BJP being anti-traitors?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Blind support
by Basheer on Jul 06, 2008 10:52 PM   Permalink
Those who were idele during Independence struggle are saying nation lovers. Those who killed Gandhiji is nation lovers.

Minorities are anti-BJP and not anti-Hindus. Those who are asking dollars instead of indian currencies are traitors?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Blind support
by Indian Indian on Jul 06, 2008 10:59 PM   Permalink
Then why no secular party including the most secular of all Mulayam singh and Laloo are raising their voice against terrorists celeberating the Amarnath Shrine land allocation revocation by anti national congress-pdp combine ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Blind support
by Dualist on Jul 06, 2008 10:59 PM   Permalink
If not anti-hindu, why the rauckus over land transfer to a Hindu shrine? Dont give me the BS of environmental harm! We have all seen how environmentally aware you moslems are!

Whoever said BJP guys were idle during independent struggle? Another Moslem taqiyah? In fact, savarkar, whom you guys defame and berate, died for the country and so also innumerable RSS guys! Show me how many moslems did it for the country? What did you give other than Pakistan?

The less said abt gandhi the better! You moslems were using him to blackmail Hindus! Dont tell me that you moslems liked him ever! I can give you references wherein you moslems even spat on his face! Go find out abt it before barking here!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Blind support
by Sastry on Jul 06, 2008 11:00 PM   Permalink
With due regard to Mahatma MKGandhi, I feel he overplayed himself post independence. He installed Nehru and hence the dynasty which has become global now. We can respect him for the struggle he made to secure independence. But HE WAS NOT IN ANY WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING FREEDOM. Britishers left all of their colonies many of them much before they left India. If the occupants were the current day talibans, Gandhi would have had a more punishing death as per shariat. The person who killed him is a nationalist to the core although there could have been a better way of resolving the issue other than by assassination.

BY THE WAY WHY SHOULD ANYONE LOOK FOR APPEASEMENT UNLESS YOU THINK YOU ARE INFERIOR.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Blind support
by R A on Jul 06, 2008 10:58 PM   Permalink
Independence struggle - For India's or for Pakistan's ????


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
BJP tried to topple UPA govt, says Amar