Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Communalism
by MUKUL GARG on Jul 05, 2008 07:05 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Our political parties stand for principles. Now Samajwadi Party has discovered that 'communalism' is more dangerous than 'imperialism'. In fact the theory of 'secularism' or 'communalism can always be used for political alignments and dis-alignments. The debate is never on real issues. Keep it up.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Communalism
by All Right on Jul 05, 2008 07:13 PM   Permalink
The NDA is in fact an alliance of a "Communal" led BJP of "Secular Parties. The UPA is an alliance of "Secular" Congress many of its members where formerly part of "Communal" BJP led NDA.

So knickerwallahs crying opportunism in SP-Congress link up is in fact smacks of hypocrisy.

Unless we give a single a party a majority, these kind of alignments are something we have to live with it.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Communalism
by Sanjiv Yadav on Jul 05, 2008 08:05 PM   Permalink
Our politicians need two things corruptions and filling their pockets. The don’t care what is the future of India if they do treaty with USA on nuclear deal? If USA does not even have enough storage of uranium then what kind of nuclear deal is this?
I can understand if you tie up with that country that had enough uranium. Then it makes sense.
USA is never in favour of India!!!
About the gas pipeline through Pakistan.. it would be the worst thinking for future. You think opponent country can let it be smooth if something wrong happens in future?

Best regards,

Dr. Sanjiv Yadav
Singapore


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Communalism
by Prem Mohan on Jul 05, 2008 07:19 PM   Permalink
Khadiwallahs are worse than knickerwallahs! Please don't base your opinion on personal invective.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Govt relieved after SP support for vote