Kashmir being an internal matter and integral part of India, US and other western powers must urge Pakistan and China to vacate occupied Indian lands, in case they want to have anything to do with the nuclear deal. There need to be more temples built across Kashmir to encourage multiculturalism and true democracy, but unfortunately Congress shot down the land transfer to the Amarnath shrine and instead are giving subsidized houses to Muslims in Maharashtra. In case China deoccupies Kashmir, it will win lots of friends in the Olympic year, otherwise India should boycott beijing olympics
RE:Nuclear deal on our terms
by Suraj Singh on Jul 05, 2008 12:52 PM Permalink
anmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue".
Criticism Manmohan Singh is often criticized by opposition parties (mainly BJP) by portraying him as the "weakest Prime Minister until now". The comment was made by Lal Krishna Advani after Manmohan Singh made a statement in which he implied that the "nuclear deal is not a big issue". [4] [5] Communist Parties (notably Somnath Chatterjee) have been criticising him since he got elected as Rajya Sabha member in 1991 from Assam. Their main argument was he is not eligible of becoming a Member of Parliament from a state where he does not reside. His statement about losing sleep on Hanif's arrest in Australia was also criticised a lot.[6]. Opposition asked whether he lost sleep when hundreds of people got killed in Hyderabad, Varanasi and Ajmer blasts. He is also the target of opposition due to the "Muslim appeasement" which the government is doing according to other political parties.[7] His statements like "Minorities, particularly the Muslims, have first right over the national resources" have also invited a lot of discussion in Indian print media [8] [9]
