1) A grouse of the antagonists of Amarnath land transfer is the alleged discontinuance of the 30% share out of the temple revenue that a Muslim family is said to have been receiving earlier, in consideration of their supposed discovery of the Amarnath shrine. Even if this story is true, that much of share out of the revenues contributed by lakhs of Hindu devotees, is simply over-greedy and against the basic tenets of Islam. Had the demand been pegged at not more than 1%, that too on condition that a major part of it again would go to a socially useful trust.
2) On some earlier occasions, the Kashmiri separatists would have us believe, during the course of media interviews, that theirs was not a communal or theocratic agenda; that a separate Kashmir envisaged a secular society and the peaceful co-existence of Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists! Now their veneer has dropped dead flat.
3) The antagonists' inveterate hatred against the Hindus forebodes the doom which is in store for the latter, in the (impossible) event of Kashmir seceding from India.
4) By the way, what happened to all the Hindu temples that lay in a number of villages strewn over an area of around 80,000 sq Kms in the Kashmir valley? What happened to the lands attached to and owned by those temples?
5) What has happened to the landed properties of the ten lakh Kashmiri Pandits that were either liquidated or driven away from the Kashmir valley?
RE:Kashmir Hindus need justice (contd.)
by zayid khan on Jul 05, 2008 07:44 PM Permalink
letz analyse the facts....
1)4 lakh pilgrimz visited the shrine..within 2 weeks..as against 2 lakhs in whole season last year 2)during last week turmoil...whn students can't go to school...patients can't reach hospitals...not a single yatri was touched or harrased...on his way to shrine.... 3)govt has built no of residential building in srinagar...for kashmiri pandith...thr was not a single protest agnst that...we believe pandithz hav right on every inch of kashmir... 4) as far as land transfer in baltal(amarnath) is concern...even the independent observrz of india did believe ..the act was driven by communal intentions of governer sinha...' there is no history of, hundred acres of forest land given to "hindu" or "muslim" shrine or board in india ...
