As a president Kalam supported thorium based power plants and rejected the Uranium based PP. Now he has changed his stand and says as a mid term, while Thorium based technology is developed, we can use nuclear based PP. Who will foot the 100 billion dollars that spent for Nuclear Based PP? Also why he changed his stand now? Is it because he does not entertain the same security as he got as a president? I poder... is he threatened to accept this deal?
RE:RE:A civilian vs a President...
by Lalit Sharma on Jul 03, 2008 11:21 PM Permalink
I have highest regards for Dr. APJ Kalam as he has given a lot to this nation and he seldem makes mistakes (seems so) BUT to err is human. By supporting the 123 agreement he is doing something which I can imagine even in drams. He is binding our hands/covering our face and letting us be raped by our sweet little neighbours / Dragon etc. The question is Why is he doing it ???
