India would have been better without Gandhi and Nehru.
Sardar Vallabhai Patel and Subhash Chandra Bose were one billion times better than these people. India would have been a much more prosperous and advanced country with them.
Gandhi's "non-violence" is most ridiculous non-sense. Gandhi himself died a violent death. So, where is non-violence? We Indians talk about ideals and think that is sufficient. Talking and practically achieving are two different things.
RE:Gandhi, Nehru, Sardar, Subhash
by Mohan Iyar on Jan 30, 2008 01:41 PM Permalink
idiots like you are able express your views becas of ghandhiji. i am sure you can't give respect to your elders. better you go to road for begging. fool
RE:Gandhi, Nehru, Sardar, Subhash
by Dheeraj Akula on Jan 30, 2008 01:53 PM Permalink
When India achieved independence, many other countries became free at around the same time - without the help of Gandhi or similar people.
So, idiots like me being able to express our views and our country's independence can not be credited to Gandhi.
RE:Gandhi, Nehru, Sardar, Subhash
by Sivaraman Srinivasan on Jan 30, 2008 01:43 PM Permalink
With due credit to Sardar and Netaji, Gandhian idealogy have been valued world over. It is truly a powerful weapon. It is just not non-violence, it was integrated in right proportion with non-cooperation; mass awareness; mass uprising; mass movement; self sustainability; involving women at every level of fight; Establishing the objective at diplomatic level etc.
It paid off. This strategy is practiced world over in some form or other today. South Africa; Abolishing racism against Blacks in America; Green Peace movement are big examples.
Violence would give quick results. But it will never last.
Yaa. Sometimes Non-violence has price in the form of violent death. But it does not mean that violence is the only solution. That is absurdity.
