RE:Facts
by kirana on Jan 25, 2008 02:03 AM Permalink
i think the point is that he DIDN'T have sex with minors. in following this story the girls are making it up. they've been collaborating to set him up. in the story it mentiones that they had been communicating and exchanging scripts to get their stories straight.
fame, fortune, revenge - these are powerful aphrodisiacs in this "reality show" world that we are now a part of. haven't you watched americas next top model, ugly betty or the movie john tucker must die? all these are examples of the way that this myspace generation think.
It's a sad day when rape is being used as an excuse by these girls that so want to be famous that they accuse club owners, fashion designers, musicians, actors etc. it seems that anyone in the spotlight with any notariety or name that they've worked hard for has to worry about young girls (and guys) that don't want to work, want the easy way to success and will do anything to get it.
look at the Duke University case. fact: the girls lied. FACT: the boys were found innocent. fact: collectively they spent US$5 million defending themselves Fact: the prosecution lied. fact: the prosecutor lost his job, his license to practice law and spent one day in jail.
in my opinion, the prosecutor should've spent more time in jail. when a prosecutor knowingly lies or falsifies information or withholds evidence exhonorating the defendant then that prosecutor should spent the same amount of time in jail as the wrongly accused did.
RE:RE:Facts
by Moo on Jan 25, 2008 10:19 PM Permalink
please look into the case, official documents that are available online, he pleaded guilty to having sex with all of the women - he just says he thought they were over 18. I wish people would stop sugarcoating the truth and looked at facts! Even if he is framed, it still means he committed crimes. He admitted to sleeping with all of these girls! what a great guy he is. And please don't delete this post, there is nothing offensive about it! Just pointing out the truth.
