Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
bad for Teesta
by Sanjeev Sharma on Jan 17, 2008 06:19 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

she supported the Porky claim for Jinnah house.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:bad for Teesta
by raj on Jan 17, 2008 06:23 PM   Permalink
she's one sad lady. her face is forever distorted, more probably because things are not going her way, than her fight for justice.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:bad for Teesta
by Ankush on Jan 17, 2008 06:31 PM   Permalink
"justice" ????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:bad for Teesta
by Singh on Jan 17, 2008 06:57 PM   Permalink
When ?where?? can you please show me any news report where she supported the claim?.. otherwise people will think that you are saying this just because she is fighting against modi. Please share the news story. Thanks

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:bad for Teesta
by Sanjeev Sharma on Jan 17, 2008 11:36 PM   Permalink
The building, constructed at a cost of Rs 2 lakh, had been lying vacant since 1982 after the British Deputy High Commissioner moved out. It was then transferred to the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), before being entrusted to the ICCR some four years ago. Says Teesta Setalvad, Editor of %u201CCommunalism Combat%u201D who is striving for Indo-Pakistan friendship, %u201CWe have to live with the reality of Pakistan. If we want friendship, we need cultural exchanges. For this, a consulate in Mumbai is a must. And Jinnah House will serve that purpose%u201D. UNI

dated : Saturday, July 7, 2001,
Chandigarh, Indian

source : the tribune, chandigarh, india

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Pak govt not to claim Jinnah House