BOMBAY City with 25 Million people will be India's Answer to HongKong and London (not now, but in another 20-30 years)
Maharashtra is a big state and it can easily have Bombay as Union territory. Tamils have TamilNadu (state) and Pondicherry (Union Territory), likewise Marathi people can have both. Why Not?
RE:WHY NOT MAKE BOMBAY A SEPARATE STATE?
by Vaibhav Pradhan on Jan 09, 2008 11:09 PM Permalink
Why can't MUMBAI City with whatever population being Maharashtra's capital won't be India's answer to Hong Kong and London? By the way, why can't you guys be original for a change? Why do we need to be an "answer" to someone? Why can't we become someone ourselves?
MUMBAI belong to Maharashtra and is capital of it. Period.
RE:WHY NOT MAKE BOMBAY A SEPARATE STATE?
by slicktiger on Jan 16, 2008 03:45 PM Permalink
Every state creation leads to.. resource roblems water disputes more regional parties with no real development agenda wastage of central funds costly elections affair money to run government more leaders..more corruption eventually state bankruptancy
Every now and then cheap polititians like KCR,Pawar,Mayawati comes up with bifurcation of states to cover up their failures and state that being united is the root cause of apathy.Central govt. really need to focus and set an agenda for every state to improve the situation in backward districts or regions .automatically the sentiment towards seperation would die down if people start seeing difference.
RE:WHY NOT MAKE BOMBAY A SEPARATE STATE?
by Pat Thakur on Jan 09, 2008 10:07 PM Permalink
So the real issue here is Partitioning Mumbai from Maharashtra then? No wonder! Marathi Mansa Jaaga Ho, Ekjuticha Dhaaga Ho; Hya Bhaiyya Ani Lunginchi, Pungi Vaajva Ho...
