It does not mean that the accused are free. They still have to go through the trial and will have travel/movement restrictions and ofcourse they had to pay to post a bail bond.
This is perfectly legal and proper procedure in any judicial system. The judge is following the law of land. Moreover, the accused is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
RE:RE:Release on bail is OK
by Ramasubbu on Jan 09, 2008 04:52 AM Permalink
JUDGES ARE FOLLOWING LAW OF LAND-- my foot, Indian judiciary is most corrupt in world. Judges openly take money. what is the integrity and accountability of Indian judges. if they were doing good job, probalby many crimes of india would have gone, and criminals would have started fearing before committing crime, rather today victims are most feared lot.
RE:Release on bail is OK
by Loan Shark on Jan 09, 2008 05:07 AM Permalink
Now that they follow the law, you call them corrupt. If they didn't follow the law, you would call them corrupt. Dammned if they follow, dammned if they don't
You are a typical desi who understands little, learns about law from watching Hindi movies and considers himself a legal expert. LOL
RE:RE:Release on bail is OK
by Ramasubbu on Jan 09, 2008 05:17 AM Permalink
Evidences can always be tampered by paying few Rupees to indian police.
By the way Loan Shark you seems to be a part of indian rotten police force or may be related to them or some one in your fmaily works for police. If you take survey in India, you will get people voting negative about judiciary and police system of india.
99% police force in India is rotten, 90% people believe police is not useful for the public or they never ever got help from police 80% people believe indian judiciary is corrupt.
so with this figure you think you talk about legal system in order? Well for 20000 Rs a judge in Ahmedabad issued arrest warrants for president , prime minister of country. had those media not worked in last few years, india would have been worst country to live , unless you are illeterate or slave or dalit who are habituated to face such atrocities.
What hindi movies show is only fraction of truth my dear Loan Shark.
The reality is that you stand in common man's shoe and see what indian judiciary has to offer to public, else there wouldn't be rape in heart of city, in broad day light in nariman point that too by uniformed police?
Do you think this is part of hindi movies.
Don;t lie master, just understand why whole world call india as most unsafe country for tourist and even insurance companies overseas do not want to give you insurance , if you belong to india or wish to travel to india.It has become hype of bureaurcrats to blame bollywood or medi
RE:Release on bail is OK
by Ramasubbu on Jan 09, 2008 05:39 AM Permalink
Policeman in India can build up fake evidences to catch innnocent as criminal and a criminal can go free by tampering his evidences.
Well how many road side poor labourers are caught as terrorists just to fill up the statistics.
In fact indian police is not even required to be called as police, They are worse than criminals or powered mafia.
RE:RE:RE:Release on bail is OK
by Loan Shark on Jan 09, 2008 08:19 AM Permalink
LOL ... you are too funny dude ... and for people like you ignorance is really a bliss.
BTW, I have no relationship with a cop or judge or even a lawyer or bailiff.
RE:Release on bail is OK
by Ramasubbu on Jan 09, 2008 05:07 AM Permalink
Did Phoolan Devi got justice? Did Maya tyagi got justice? Rather they got raped by our Judicial system or legal implementors who are just mafia, buy and sell law with the support of their position.
I think crime in India is more because of bribe and misuse of power, not as such there are criminals who want to do this. But since it is been sposored by corrupt legal system and corrupt police there are crimes here.
Remove this corrupt money making judiciary and police, India's most crimes will vanish by itself.. Now crimes have been made as business by our own legal sytem.
RE:RE:Release on bail is OK
by Loan Shark on Jan 09, 2008 05:09 AM Permalink
whether someone got justice or not is a personal opinion ... the convicted guy will never say that he/she got justice ... if you acquit the suspect for lack of evidence, the victim will say that he/she did not get justice.
