Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Question and Answer
by Netflix on Jan 05, 2008 10:22 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Question: How will you define freedom of expression in India?
Answer: It is the right of M. F. Hussain to abuse
Hindu sentiments. Kids you should also know its limits. When you try to abuse Islam it is called
Hurting sentiments. So, Taslima Nasreen should be punished and M.F. Hussain should be rewarded.
Question: How do you show your secular credential
Answer: By being silent on Taslima issue and crying out loud when someone say anything about M.F. Hussain

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 10:46 AM   Permalink
Dear brother Abhinav,
I will convert to hinduism if you prove that the prophet married his daughter in law. Can you tell me the name of his son and his mother ? Trust me I will give up my religion if you can prove that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:01 AM   Permalink
Arif i have replied to query, now lets see how honest are u?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:28 AM   Permalink
why u dont reply to actual query?
why dont u change kuran as time has got changed and its not 6th century.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:21 AM   Permalink
Well brother Sudhir.
You and I have the same blood. I might not agree with the process of you worship but I respect your feelings. So I will never abuse you.
Secondly, the prophet took care of Zaid. So he was son like and there was no blood relation between them.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:13 AM   Permalink
arif,
u guys will go on and on.
atleast read kuran & hadiths whom u consider as final word.
u cant keep ur word and will continue to argue.
but hats off to u for truly believing in ur religion that never ever believe other persons even if they are true.
(you are now saying that adopted son is not son in actual manner)
In this way kuran was written 1400 years ago so it needs to be chaged for today.
now dont say that its the final word of allah because allah existed even before and he can not practice to come to ultimate truth.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:00 AM   Permalink
daughter in law-Zainab Bint Jahsh
Son: Zaid Ibn Muhammad (adopted son so for making marriage a fit case he denounce adoption)
Shall i tell u the hadith as well?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:05 AM   Permalink
So there was no blood relation between the prophet and Zaid. Correct me if I am wrong :-)

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:04 AM   Permalink
So you accept he was not his son ? Right ? Till now you said he was his son :-) now you say he was his adopted son!!!
Can you please specify the adoption laws existing at that time?
Atleast you have come down from son to son like :-) good.


Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Question and Answer
by balaord on Jan 05, 2008 11:08 AM   Permalink
Just because some one thinks or some one says thats some one is a SON doesnt make himself a SON!!!An adopted SON is not a SON.Islam has smashed all man made myths and relationships by sanctionicing this marriage..The same holds for any such "adopted" relationship.These relationships only is in the minds of people and not a relaity!!!

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:17 AM   Permalink
yes mr arif and mr balaord , u have smashed all relationships.
thats why u r true followers of islam.
thats why islam is not a religion but a jungle law- perhaps i m making a mistake by comparing u with animals because i believe even animals dont believe in in cest

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Question and Answer
by balaord on Jan 05, 2008 11:07 AM   Permalink
Just because some one thinks or some one says thats some one is a daugher doesnt make herself a daughter!!!An adopted daughter is not a Daughter.Islam has smashed all man made myths and relationships by sanctionicing this marriage..


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by shaji tabor on Jan 05, 2008 11:15 AM   Permalink
How many times PBUH got married ?

balaord and arif this question is just for information,not for abuse

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:11 AM   Permalink
Dear brother Aditya,
I know my religion :-)
I know the prophet and Zaid did not have any blood relation. This has been accepted by your friends on this board :-)
So when there was no blood relation what wrong in what the prophet did ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:21 AM   Permalink
we accept whatever is true but u guys will just continue to argue even the truth.
now say even ayesh was a adult when she got married but not a 6 year toddler.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:25 AM   Permalink
There are varying estimates of Ayeshas age. I can give you references from the ancient religious books that can put Ayeshas age around 15. So you can believe what you like to :-).
Will muslims love the prophet less ? No. We know about him, we know how he single handedly took us out of ignorance towards light. The political realities of the world will keep on changing. Somtimes x will be in power and sometime y will be in power. But God will remain one and my faith in God will remain one.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 11:34 AM   Permalink
i dont sa that ur faith in God should be diminshed,it should be maximum at all the times.
but change according to time and forgive for saying but muhammad was not ahuman at all leave alone perfect human(dont claim that he is prophet)
for ur information it is written in Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
that ayesh was 6 six years old.
atleast be true to urself.


Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by Sudhir Dixit on Jan 05, 2008 01:04 PM   Permalink
This is the problem.
U urself decide what is suitable and what is not?
when questions were raised on hadiths then u say it was compiled after the death of muhammad.
atleast accept the truths written in hadiths because i can assume that u will not keep ur word of changing ur religion!

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Question and Answer
by Arif on Jan 05, 2008 11:37 AM   Permalink
When was Sahih Bukhari compiled ? Do you know how many years after the demise of the prophet. Do you know that there are many hadith in Sahih Bukhari that are not considered to be authentic because they do not corroborate with the quran.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Question and Answer
by shaji tabor on Jan 05, 2008 10:29 AM   Permalink
Every secularist will denounce MF Hussain for hurting Hindu sentiments,and not entertain Taslim for eating indian money which must be utlised for the poor hungry indians which incldes hindus,muslims,sikhs and all other religions

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
I am not allowed to move out: Taslima