Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by You yourself on Jan 05, 2008 10:42 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

The city has developed because of enterprising people from other states, particularly Gujaratis including the Parsis. Maharashtra people only know how to demand and grab government jobs and resources, and demand bribes. No wonder the only takers for Amchi Mumbai are mostly lower class and uneducated people.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Aditya Phadnis on Jan 05, 2008 10:45 PM   Permalink
Bangalore does not belong to Karnataka as majority of It workers are non Kanadigas.

Calcutta does not belong to Bengal as majority of workers belong to Bihar and Eastern UP.

Madras does not belong to Tamilnadu as majority of working People belong to Kerala and Andhra Pradesh.

Well UP and Bihar only belongs to UP and Bihar reason being no one wants to own Hell.!!!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Prince Aniston on Jan 05, 2008 10:48 PM   Permalink
haha ..........well said

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by ramchandra murthy on Jan 05, 2008 11:19 PM   Permalink
MR PHADNIS as your name seems we Kanndigas are in a minoirty in bangalore but it seems we have learnt to attack non Kannadigas from you Ghatis.It is now that kannadigas know that we have to compete with non migrants and not cry like you Marathis. And yes we are rady for a separte UT banagalore. Are u ready

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Rebel on Jan 05, 2008 10:51 PM   Permalink
From your surname you don't seem to be a Koli ...the natural inhabitant of Mumbai ...

So where do you belong ?????

Looking at the contribution of your community ...apart from stoning Malls , demanding "reservation" , blackening somebody's face and collecting " vargani" you guys have done nothing ....absolutely nothing .....

Go and check from your forefathers even they have migrated from Malwan or Kolhapur or Marathwada .....

Ask them why they migrated ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Analyze on Jan 05, 2008 11:53 PM   Permalink
I(f North Indians were so developing people or developed people then please explain me why are bihar and UP backward? why is gilr child ratio in hariyana and punjab the lowest? why is TAX contribution to national exchequer lowest from Bihar or UP ? Why is there more than 60 percent power theft in these states? So developed arent they they dont get job in any other state their staes have failed to create jobs education facilities in north india are poorest
most students migrate south for studies.
Why has Tamilnadu not been able to solve water issues or find some way out to cut women child atrocities? how come andhra cannot contribute a more than 790 crores in direct taxes inspite of boasting of IT exports? same is banglore and karnataka , half of old hyderabad population is marathi including business schools and administration ? what rubbish are u talking saying that Mumbai has developed because of migrants.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Migrants have defamed Mumbai: Uddhdav