The city has developed because of enterprising people from other states, particularly Gujaratis including the Parsis. Maharashtra people only know how to demand and grab government jobs and resources, and demand bribes. No wonder the only takers for Amchi Mumbai are mostly lower class and uneducated people.
RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Aditya Phadnis on Jan 05, 2008 10:42 PM Permalink
Bangalore does not belong to Karnataka as majority of It workers are non Kanadigas.
Calcutta does not belong to Bengal as majority of workers belong to Bihar and Eastern UP.
Madras does not belong to Tamilnadu as majority of working People belong to Kerala and Andhra Pradesh.
Well UP and Bihar only belongs to UP and Bihar reason being no one wants to own Hell.!!!
RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Max on Jan 06, 2008 03:11 AM Permalink
Phadnis-- i think you are learning something now...all these cities are part of India..so all INDIANS...whether migrants/ immigrants have the right to go and live in any city of India as long as the person is Indian...this is a constitutional right
RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Calspadeaspade on Jan 06, 2008 12:39 AM Permalink
If bangalore or Chennai is good it is because of the local government giving good administration and welcoming investors and creating confidence. Will any investor have the guts to go to Kerala or West bengal? Why not create an atmosphere where business can grow in these back ward states like UP and Bihar. The politicians there are so corrupt and stupid goons they dont even have the brains to welcome investment. These Biharis and Upites come to other states and ruin it with arrogance.
RE:RE:Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by Calspadeaspade on Jan 06, 2008 12:42 AM Permalink
I as the biggest critic of DMk but you can not deny that these people had some brains and and they are good administrators.They are progressive. Why cant one see that in in UP or Bihar?
