Mr. Dhruv, I would advise you to research some of histories worst atrocities against people, and use them when in conversations. The worst to date is the torture and slaughter of about 9 million women and children in the name of witchcraft, this was done in Europe, research it, you will be appalled.
RE:RE:India abroad
by bombay on Feb 29, 2008 02:16 AM Permalink
prasad u really think og gandhi, wat giri? he is really the father of the nation in the literal sense...man ..father of alll the children , but who are the motheres...
RE:India abroad
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 29, 2008 01:56 AM Permalink
Bihar mey kab 9 million people slaughter kar diye gaye Mr Genius !! Har cheej mey kyon boltey ho merey bhai !!
RE:India abroad
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 29, 2008 02:16 AM Permalink
He is right, Gandhi understood that Indians are not capable enough to fight against superior British army and apart from that there are many divisions in the society and petty differences which doesn't allow them to fight together. Apart from that he also realised that millions will be killed if Indians fight with the britishers.
RE:India abroad
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 29, 2008 02:05 AM Permalink
Thanks Man !! I have hated and hated like Mr On and I have realised from this Raj Thackrey incident that hatred is not the solution, atleast it changed me not to hate on any divisions like caste region or religion...hope Mr On too realises this
RE:India abroad
by on Feb 29, 2008 02:25 AM Permalink
Mayank,
You are portraying Gandhi as an elected leader of the people who is responsible for their lives!
Please show some or any evidence where it shows Gandhi as an elected official.
Gandhi was a baniya who felt humiliated by the treatment he got in South Africa even after studying to be a barrister at law.
All he did was stand up to a ticket collector on a train ride. BFD!
The real tragedy is that the Indian people fell for this gimmick and were fooled into thinking that he was the answer to their prayers!
Gandhi was not obliged to take up the leadership of the freedom movement. If that was the case, then all baniyas like you would have been government babus post-independence instead of the pee-mps your are now!!
RE:India abroad
by prasad on Feb 29, 2008 02:02 AM Permalink
Great job Mayank. This guy finally resigned. I had seen gandhigiri in movies only. I saw it live here.
RE:India abroad
by talk fame on Feb 29, 2008 01:59 AM Permalink
Mayank..tere ko bola naa chor "ON" ko..he is just having a good time writing such comments. He is too bored out of his life.
RE:India abroad
by Mayank Agarwal on Feb 29, 2008 02:00 AM Permalink
Yea chalo bhai logo i am going to sleep !! Good nite !! Mr On I am really sorry if I misbehaved with you or spoiled your fun tonight !!
RE:India abroad
by shaheed sant on Feb 29, 2008 02:00 AM Permalink
if Bihar is made bad wonder how Laloo posting profits for Railways in India. what's happening there?
RE:RE:India abroad
by talk fame on Feb 29, 2008 02:03 AM Permalink
Shaheed bhai..lalu is one of the most shrewd politicians in the entire country. He knows what he is doing. He played with Bihar because he did not care less. For the Railways, he is just reaping the benefits from the seens sown by Nitish Kumar (Rly minister before him). Plus he wants to be PM in the future. So these are all his gimmicks. Railways might be in profits because lalu wants it to so that he can get more vote banks. In Bihar, he did not need to prove anything to win votes for a long time until people finally realized and kicked him out.
RE:RE:India abroad
by prasad on Feb 29, 2008 02:04 AM Permalink
Bihar is facing the same in India what India is facing on the world level. Ignorance. Wrong impression.
