There are areas of Maharashtra including Mumbai which do not have Marathi majority, and Marathis have never contributed very much to those areas. Instead of creating a separate state for Mumbai, it was included in Maharashtra which is a grave wrong to non-Marathis in Mumbai. The same could be said for Chennai, but Delhi got lucky. Maharashtra has border disputes with almost every state around it because of their mentality.
RE:Maharashtra is wrongly defined
by ramchandra murthy on Feb 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Pradhan I think you seem to suffer from amnesia , its your great shivaji father a traitor in the Muslim Adil Shahi army of Bijapur and its your great Shivajis son Samabaji who was captured, tortured, converted to islam and then brutually killed by Aurangzeb so please dont speak out of turn . When the Potuguese invaded Goa the first ones to run were the Marathis and Koknis into what is today Karanataka. The Kannadigas took care of their fellow Hindus immenently Timoji and Kittur Rani fought valaintly gainst the Portuguese and what we got back today is Your great Messiah of the Hindus Bal thakceray Threatning my fellow Kannadigas in May 2005 . This time you Marathis are attacked and see what we Kannadigas will do last time we saved you this time we will finnish
