If you think Muslims were forcefully converted then imagine 900 yrs of muslim rule whole of india would have been converted you all 80% hindus are the proof that the muslim rulers never forced for conversion...Think about south india my brothers TIPU NIZAMS etc if they have forced i dont think hinduism or any other religion would have ever flourished...what about sikhs they were too small a community...Buddhis-they wouldl never pose any challenge cos of non-voilence they follow...the 80% hindus are glaring eveidence that muslim rulers never objected to they being hindus...
RE:RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by sabilillah on Feb 29, 2008 01:54 PM Permalink
Oh really! Marathas ka paratha banaya tha AHMED SHAH ABDALI, founder of Ahmedabad, Aurangzeb hit the sardars hard every time there was a revolt you better check
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by akash chopra on Feb 29, 2008 01:52 PM Permalink
I am saying they hv no fault. It is these disease, which has stuck them, becase of no fault of their but their forefathers. If u hv Malayria whole body pains.
Similar way this desease is mind desease. Mind wl become restless and think whole world is against them. Their mind them allow to view this beutiful world only by wearing some spectacles. They mind will not get peace, and no fault of theirs.
RE:RE:RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by sabilillah on Feb 29, 2008 01:56 PM Permalink
wow come out with remedy you will be awarded a nobel hehehe Cant you get a nobel for india hehehehe????
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by akash chopra on Feb 29, 2008 01:58 PM Permalink
It is deseased person, who suffers. Good luck and have peace of mind....or shall i say ......good luck in heaven with hoor bye!
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by JGN on Feb 29, 2008 01:56 PM Permalink
sabilillah, first of all there is no need to be proud of the legacy of muslim rulers. They were just like the politicins of our time. Once having established, they were interested in amassing wealth, filling up their harems with beautiful women, building monuments, etc.
Had they cared for the muslims, there was no need for Sachar Commission and things like that. All Indians were not cowards to to be converted at the point of sword. As always, only the poorest of the poor and indenfensible get affected. Most of those who were converted to Islam were the poor and as such the conditin of muslims are also not different from that of the Dalits and lower castes from other religions.
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by akash chopra on Feb 29, 2008 01:46 PM Permalink
Rel. of pis... Death.. 72 hoors in heaven ? People's minds have got infected and they can't remain in peace and always thinks about rel.. and not anthing else. Because of these desease, which has stuck to them, because of their fathers and forefathers.
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by Rajesh S on Feb 29, 2008 01:48 PM Permalink
do you think it would be feasible to convert such a huge population? ANy ruler's army would have been predominantly Hindu. Wouldnt there have been an army revolt? It wouold be suicide if any ruler took it up. It was only the invaders who converted people of INdia
RE:MUSLIMS WERE NEVER CONVERTED!
by sabilillah on Feb 29, 2008 01:52 PM Permalink
My brother invaders stayed for few months in india and left after that people would have reverted on the other hand 900 yrs would mean atleast 11 generations... the oppurtunity to convert would be even higher...Also rememeber each king as individual was different AKBAR was secular in approach unlike aurangzeb...so broden your thinking man...
