First Thackeray started his carrier by chasing away madarasis from Mumbai. Secondly he was responsible for Musilm riots in Mumbai. Thirdly he was also involved in anti dalit campaign regarding naming Ambedkar to the Univeristy.Now Junior Thackery is aganist all North Indians. Tomarrow, he will be fight aganist all nonshivsenas.Then he destroy everybody except his family members. Then he will destroy his family females. It will go on. Hudos to Thackerys.
RE:Thackeray's rule
by CMat on Feb 24, 2008 08:39 PM Permalink
Instead of studying root issues, you seems wasting ur life on Thakres. In Chennai reservations went too high and All Ayyars , Ayyangars fled to Mumbai, Delhi, Singapore, Maleshia ...It was basically Tamilnadu govt prob. TN never improved on that. and madrasis (all over .not recent Maleshia incident)suffer becoz of lack of their own state's care. Thakres was not against Ambedkar, But many thought that Ramanand teerth deseved more. Ramanandteerth is the gut who fougth against Nijaams around independence(Ambedkar has had a pact with Nijaam and brits for diff Dalit land). Having said that i m not saying anything wrong against Ambedkar..He was great guy (The pact was just political mistake.thanks god he didnt succed in that). And now about recent things in Mumbai....Just read Last paragraph of main artical MORE.It should help
RE:RE:Thackeray's rule
by Tom on Feb 24, 2008 09:11 PM Permalink
It reads -
""We are not against the common man or the migrant workers from UP and Bihar. If somebody changes according to the house of the host (Maharashtra), he is welcome, but if somebody wants to change the host's home by dadagiri (force), we will never tolerate it," Raj asserted."
Maharashtra is as much home of a guy from UP or Bihar, who is settled there, as a local guy. And he is free to celebrate any festival, follow any religion, culture and speak any language he wishes. The son of soil theory is against the very concept of India.
