Hamid Mir makes an interesting observation but unfortunately without providing more details to substantiate his statement.
He states - "Musharraf was rejected mainly due to his bad strategy in the war against terror. He killed more Pakistanis in this war than the Indians killed in the wars of 1965 and 1971. He is heading towards a very bad and painful end."
Does anybody have some real information on the casualties during the two wars and the current internal turmoil in Pakistan?
If the statement is indeed true, then Hamid Mir admits there are more terrorists in Pakistan today than those soldiers who died fighting. Aren't the Pakistani politicians, and dictators, who ruled much before Musharraf also equally responsible for the damage they caused to the Pak civil society? They encouraged hatred. They encouraged violent ways. Is it Musharraf's fault alone?
RE:How many Pakistanis did Musharraf's regime kill?
by puneet gupta on Feb 19, 2008 01:25 AM Permalink
"than the indians killed in the war" the authors tone and intent is dubious here
RE:How many Pakistanis did Musharraf's regime kill?
by Raja Ashok on Feb 19, 2008 01:46 AM Permalink
Author's intent is not dubious at all. What all he means in a war, it is Indians who should die. Summary: Musharraf could not kill enough Indians during his tenure. Hence due to his under performance in the acts of terror, people of the Rakshas Kingdom, i.e., the Rakshasas aka pakis are angry and chose a new Rakshas king to lead the war against human beings..
So, my dear beloved people of the sacred Bharat Varsha! Be prepared for the flare up in the acts of terror against the human beings. The Rakshas are hell bent on killing human beings.
