Why should Raj be blamed for fomenting regionalism ?? When DMK supports LTTE why is there no concern about regionalism ?? When Akalis install the portrait of Gernail Singh Bihdrawale in Dam Dami Taksal ( who wanted to break up India) why was there chilly silence among the desh Bhakts ?? When Bengalis openly rioted to protest against exclusion of Saurabh Ganguly from Indian Cricket team where were the those who cry foul agaist regionalism ?? The truth is people from UP and Bihar have swamped the states like Delhi, Orissa, Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan. Wherever they go they start behaving like they are in Azamgarh or Siwan. They do not respect the culture in which they go. Raj Thakeray's fight is against those that want to convert maharahstra into azamgarh or Siwan. This fight is not for jobs or resources but to maintain local culture and avoid lawlessness of UP and bihar. Lalu and Amarshing should take a dip in chulu bhar pani because it is their failure that people from UP and BIhar are flocking to other states. What have they done to improve the situation in UP and Bihar ?? Before commenting on what is right and wrong these leaders should get out of their AC cars and mix with common people instead of partying with bollywood celebrities . Just ask people of Orrisa, Delhi, Assam, Rajasthan about people from UP and Bihar and you will know why the Raj Thakeray got so much support. As for Abu he is ISI agent. Govt should expedite pending criminal cases against him.
RE:Raj is partially right
by GRJ on Feb 12, 2008 08:19 AM Permalink
Why dont UP, Bihar look after the basic survival of poor working cl;ass like in other states which give free house and appeasements.....at least for the damned votes ???
RE:Raj is partially right
by sehil on Feb 12, 2008 07:01 AM Permalink
amar and mulayam dont represent UP . they r bigger morons than raj. but who gave the right to inflict violence on poor people. who has developed mumbai(rest of maha is as backward as bihar)? mumbai is devepoled by all indians and becoz of cosmopolitan nature it has attracted major investments nad now u dont want people from north. who the hell r u to decide? u (attatar)should be put in the same cell as abu azmi. and what marathi culture r u talking about when all the marathis r sending their childrens to convent . they dont learn marathi themselves. if u want to live in stone age they continue to live in it. u can speak marathi or even saskrit or even dev nagiri. no wonder marathi r notgetting jobs
RE:Raj is partially right
by pushpraj nimbalkar on Feb 12, 2008 10:30 AM Permalink
sehil have ever visited maharashtra........you fool just come once to pune.......we will show you what we can do.......and as far as rest of maharashtra is concerned you dont need to worried about that becoz we have better than bihar at any point.......we have growing cities like pune......nashik........sangli....satara........what you have just think before posting anything......
RE:Raj is partially right
by Roger Binny on Feb 12, 2008 09:03 AM Permalink
Hey Sehil go and tell them to these leaders of your community which you are so proud of. Listen if you guys dont behave the way we want you to, like normal human beings, these things will happen again and again. Who goes to convent and learns Marathi is none of your business. Stop preaching Marathi to Marathis, you don't know Marathi. Again "don't say what Marathi culture" you might pay for it. This is not your dustbin state of Bihar or UP. Go back or we will send you back.
