EVERY BODY IN INDIA IS FREE TO TRAVEL TO ANY PLACE IN INDIA. WHAT IS RAJ THAKRE'S CONTRIBUTION IN MAHARASHTRA'S DEVELOPMENT? HE IS DEVELOPING HIMSELF BY BUYING TEXTILE MILLS AND DRIVING AWAY MILL WORKERS OUT OF MUMBAI. HE IS KILLING GARIB MARATHI MANUS LIKE RAMESH KINI. HE IS DOING ALL THIS CHILDISH ACTIVITIES NOT FOR MARATHIS BUT FOR SELF BENEFIT. AFTER ALL AAM AADMI IS SAME EVERYWHERE IN INDIA. AS FOR AS MAHARASHTRA DEVELOPMENT ALREADY GUJRAT AND MOST OF THE SOUTH INDIAN STATES ARE GOING AHEAD. ITS ONLY MUMBAI AND SURROUNDING AREA THAT IS DEVELOPED AND BECAUSE INDUSTRIALISTS AND EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS ARE ALL NON MAHARASHTRIANS. ONCE PORTS AND INFRASTRUCTURES GET DEVELOPED TO OTHER AREAS IN INDIA AUTO MATICALLY INDUSTRIALISTS ARE GOING TO MOVE AWAY FROM MUMBAI.
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by Vineit on Feb 09, 2008 04:07 PM Permalink
Watch any telivision news channels the will always be busy showing the crimes happening in the North States...
They should start a separate crime channel showing the crimes happeing in north india, speciall in UP & Bihar.
you dirt creatures you dont deserve to stay here...
RE:RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by sarla on Feb 09, 2008 01:39 PM Permalink
state is secondary in india. It is only for the sake of governance and a state can be reorganised or even broken into many states. What is important for one living in these states is to how best he can live and suppoert his families. Ther is no value to states in India. If you say like this ten all thane , aurangabad, kolhapur, solapur, ratnagiri and latur people must remain in their district only. Why should they come to mumbai to disturb us who are living here from muchh before ????????????
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by san veer on Feb 09, 2008 02:02 PM Permalink
All the districts in Maharashtra are closely bounded to each other with Mumbai at center. it is not soft bonding like Indian states. Mumbai is capital of maharashtra and Maharashtrians have the only right to come to Mumbai or go to any part of Maharashtra. Non maharastrians can come as touriest and go back once their holidays are over.
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by sarla on Feb 09, 2008 02:50 PM Permalink
Only mumbai district people have right to live in mumbai . All other districts' people don't have any rights over mumbai. Mumbai was not in Shivaji's Maharashtra. It was Raigad rajdhani of maharashtra man. I think leave the districts you don't have any right outside your village or city boundry. Why troble people of other villages and cities . only you can go there as visitor.
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by sarla on Feb 09, 2008 01:22 PM Permalink
there are good maharashtrian leaders as well and bulic in general is peace ful. I think few individual politicians create problem for there personal advancements. common people and police suffers. What is best is remove security of all these leaders and tell them to have your personal security and pay for that themselves. they remain secure in free police protection and make any statement which ultimately result inconvenience for common man. they shoud make all this comments in absence of govt. security and be ready to get slapped for their actions perhaps that may make them fear abot their own coments.
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by Shankar on Feb 09, 2008 01:25 PM Permalink
well said but i fail to see this in reality....may not be possible even after 50 more years!!
RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by Shankar on Feb 09, 2008 01:17 PM Permalink
we shud also add amar singh/mulayam to the list as they added fuel inorder to get into the limelite!!!
RE:RE:NAMARD RAJ THAKRE
by sarla on Feb 09, 2008 01:32 PM Permalink
You may add them if you want because they are not good people at all. they are also politicians always begging for vote bank and tried to utilise the opportunity but for me it looks like they were provoked and there action was just reaction and there crime is secondary in nature but congress will like to weigh them in same side like raj thakre.
