Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Mumbai
by Rajamani on Feb 08, 2008 05:10 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Each & every one says that India is one country & citizens has got right to stay or work any where in India. In that case why kashmir is not governed by this rule ? Let the Govt of UP, Bihar, and other northern states ask their people to go & stay and kashmir, this will easily solve the militancy problem there. Also give weapons to those who are going to kashmir to protect themselves from the militants. The present congress govt has no guts to do this. Or the Lalu's, Mulayam's or the commies will never show guts to fight terror with terror. Wake up Indians. Jai Hind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by Siddhesh Sabnis on Feb 08, 2008 05:14 PM   Permalink
Jisko jahan jaana hai jaao, jisko jidhar aana hai aao. Kyon apna khoon jalao, yeh politics ka khel hai pyaare, kyon dimaag ko takleef main lao.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by Vinayak Gadekar on Feb 08, 2008 07:09 PM   Permalink
Rajamani, go and learn history.

Kashmir is different from rest of the states because it was never an Indian state at 1947. Pak first marched into Kashmir, then India reacted in the same way. Both have stayed at the LoC for 60 years. So both are aggressors in Kashmir.

At least India is slightly fair and benevolent. It has accorded a special status (Article 370) to Indian-administered Kashmir.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by deepak shukla on Feb 08, 2008 05:16 PM   Permalink
u r pefectly right,Mr.Rajamani.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by jayesh on Feb 08, 2008 05:11 PM   Permalink
YOUR ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by me mumbaikar on Feb 08, 2008 05:18 PM   Permalink
Rajamani well said man....three cheers for u...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by Harish Manwani on Feb 08, 2008 05:28 PM   Permalink
The me-mumbaikar champions forget one thing - that Mumbai has become what it is today mostly due to its good fortune in being located bang in the middle of the country, being a natural port, and because the British settled there early. It's got very little to do with which state it is in. Mumbai's prime location attracted talent from all over the country, which automoatically made it a cosmopolitan city, with a strongly grounded migrant work ethic. The rest is history. Maharashtra claiming itself to be the sole reason for Mumbau's prosperity and claiming first ownership of Mumbai is really ridiculous, considering the big part so-called 'outsiders' have played in making the city what it is today! If non-maharashtrains leave Mumbai, it will cease being India's vibrant commercial capital and become just another small town.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Mumbai
by Vinayak Gadekar on Feb 08, 2008 07:13 PM   Permalink
So the great Mr Harish Manwani, why don't you pack up and leave Mumbai ? In fact that is what Raj is saying.

All of you, pack and go to your respective regions. That will either take you to Gujarat or Sindh in Pakistan. Your choice !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by nandu on Feb 08, 2008 06:17 PM   Permalink
why not other city. any city to prosper it nedds only godd law & order. everything follows. bihar & UP have good soil, mineral, water but u know the status why?
this is an achivement of maharashtra & marthi manoos

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Mumbai
by earthy man on Feb 08, 2008 05:13 PM   Permalink
madam,
UNO will stop india from doing so. Do not be dump stupit. The security council will put india to task. Understand international rules.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Raj is a chicken: Bal Thackeray