RE:Bal Thackeray . Ulimately stood for national unity
by Fun Lover on Feb 08, 2008 07:41 PM Permalink
Really? Not so long ago Bal Thackeray had problems with non-Marathis. How about his statement -
"However, the Sena chief added that those who gave excuses of constitutional rights of every Indian to live and work in any part of the country should keep in mind that this right was not exercised at the cost of the locals."
RE:RE:Bal Thackeray . Ulimately stood for national unity
by kavita rawat on Feb 08, 2008 08:48 PM Permalink
Dear Read the constitution it is not Balasahebs mind it is in law!
RE:Bal Thackeray . Ulimately stood for national unity
by jatin on Feb 08, 2008 07:44 PM Permalink
that are practical statements and ignoring it ... India has already seens ill effect of it in Assam ...
RE:Bal Thackeray . Ulimately stood for national unity
by Vaibhav Pradhan on Feb 08, 2008 07:43 PM Permalink
You idiot. If Nitish can be worried about Biharis, Mulayam can be worried about UP's, Karunanidhi can be worried about Tamils then why can't Bal Thackeray be worried about Marathis?
Read his original editorial in Marathi instead of making your opinion on translated English then you will know what he has to say about Marathi and Hindutva.
RE:Bal Thackeray . Ulimately stood for national unity
by Fun Lover on Feb 08, 2008 07:48 PM Permalink
When did I say Bal Thackeray cannot be worried about Marathis? But he is prejudiced against non-Marathis, not just worried about Marathis. Bal Thackeray fails to realize that Mumbai has developed due to contributions from all Indians, and not just Marathis.
Instead of advising me to read junk Bal Thackeray's editorials, why don't you tell me what is the great revelation that Thackeray made in them?
